卡馬拉·哈里斯在德州休斯頓的集會演講
 
 

0:00 副總統卡馬拉·哈里斯和碧昂絲在休斯頓的演講 
0:50 凱莉·羅蘭在卡馬拉·哈里斯集會上發言 
4:12 碧昂絲作為母親，希望她的孩子們和所有孩子們生活在一個有權控制自己身體的世界 
9:39 碧昂絲介紹副總統卡馬拉·哈里斯 
13:41 距離決定美國未來的選舉還有11天 
14:13 美國不會倒退 
15:20 卡馬拉·哈里斯說德州有全美最嚴格的墮胎禁令之一。從受孕那一刻起，德州就禁止墮胎 
16:23 在德州，醫生和護士只是提供生育護理就可能面臨終身監禁 
16:40 德州現在有一條法律，提供現金獎勵舉報幫助他人獲得所需護理的人 
17:13 在德州的一些縣，已經透過了旅行禁令，禁止婦女前往其他州接受護理 
17:28 唐納德·特朗普當總統時，特意挑選了三名最高法院成員，想要取消《羅訴韋德案》的保護 
17:39 現在有超過20個州有特朗普式的墮胎禁令 
19:51 同樣的極端領導人也拒絕延長兒童稅收抵免 
20:24 特朗普的墮胎禁令讓醫生離開了德州、愛達荷州、喬治亞州和北卡羅來納州 
25:27 德州，現在這個州和我們的國家正經歷醫療危機，唐納德·特朗普是其中的主導者 
27:28 德州的總檢察長正在起訴美國政府 
27:39 德州的檢察官可以查到前往外州接受護理的女性的私人醫療記錄 
28:53 特朗普將要求所有50個州追蹤並報告女性的流產和墮胎情況，還會限制避孕和試管嬰兒治療的使用 
31:03 當國會透過恢復生育自由的法案時，卡馬拉將作為美國總統自豪地簽署該法案 
32:02 每次在選票上出現時，美國人民都會選擇自由 
32:52 生育自由在這次總統選舉和全國10個州的選票上 
35:32 德州，離選舉日還有11天。提前投票已經開始，現在是時候計劃你的投票了
  查看全部

美國前總統奧巴馬模仿Eminem名曲Lose Yourself 因為版權，模仿說唱原片請到我的X（原twitter）平臺賬戶觀看
 
https://x.com/broheisbrian/status/1850262810095501566 
点击观看前美国总统奥巴马模仿阿姆说唱名曲（现场版）

0:00 美國前總統奧巴馬入場 
0:09 以下為奧巴馬開始模仿阿姆的說唱名曲Lose yoursel 
0:38 奧巴馬超級喜歡阿姆。
 

 
 
  查看全部

說唱教父阿姆Eminem為卡馬拉哈里斯站臺，全場沸騰尖叫掀翻屋頂
 
 

 
 
0:00 說唱教父阿姆Eminem走入集會現場 
0:23 全場沸騰尖叫掀翻屋頂 
0:59 阿姆Eminem鼓勵德州選民出去為哈里斯投票 
1:02 姆爺認為人們不應該害怕表達自己的觀點。 
1:18 阿姆Eminem認為哈里斯會擁護美國的未來，在未來，自由和許多其他自由將得到保護和維護。 
1:37 google美國公牛網，討論更多美國總統大選2024最新話題
 

 
Eminem speaks at Kamala Harris rally in Detroit:

Detroit! What up, though?

So look, I wrote down a few things I wanted to say. I’m here tonight for a couple of important reasons. As most of you know, the city of Detroit and the whole state of Michigan mean a lot to me. And going into this election, the spotlight is on us more than ever, and I think it’s important to use your voice. So I’m encouraging everybody to get out and vote, please. I also think that people shouldn’t be afraid to express their opinions.

And I don’t think anyone wants an America where people are worried about retribution or what people will do if you make your opinion known. I think Vice President Harris supports a future for this country where these freedoms and many others will be protected and upheld. And here to tell you much more about that, President Barack Obama. 查看全部

 

  
 
馬斯克和美國賓州選民見面會, 90分鐘問答互動精華版, 中英雙語影片翻譯
 
 
00:00:00 馬斯克和美國賓州選民見面會 
00:01:01 a lot of people think we Americans didn't go to the moon, but we did.很多人認為我們美國人沒有登上月球，但我們真的去過月球。 
00:06:50 Elon Musk believe in the government influences the media too much.馬斯克認為政府對媒體干預過多。 
00:08:21 Q&A Session 互動問答環節 
00:08:32 what makes you Elon Musk interested in politics now?馬斯克回答為什麼對政治如此感興趣？ 
00:10:40 California is a super majority Dem state, and so it's one-party rule.馬斯克堅信加利福尼亞是一個超級多數的民主黨州，因此是一黨專政的統治。 
00:11:04 Cumala's just a puppet of a larger machine.卡馬拉只是一個更大權力機器的傀儡。 
00:14:03 The reason why Elon Musk acquired Twitter was because Elon Musk could feel the walls closing in. 馬斯克覺得收購推特的重要原因是馬斯克感受到四周的壓力加大。 
00:18:04 Unless there's a genuine risk to the country, all information in the government should be public.除非對國家有真正的風險，政府中的所有資訊都應該公開。 
00:19:45 what advice do you have for young entrepreneurs like us to conquer a challenge that seems almost impossible from the beginning?伊隆馬斯克對年輕企業家有什麼建議，以征服看似幾乎不可能的挑戰？ 
00:29:25 whether AI and blockchain can be used to track every dollar that the government spends, makes people accountable to the very last person 是否可以利用人工智慧和區塊鏈追蹤政府每一美元的支出，讓每個人都對最後一分錢負責 00:32:59 Elon Musk believe in the sort of physics approach to thinking. 馬斯克相信一種物理學的思維方式 
00:35:08 the cumulative voice of the people should decide what is news worthy，not a small number of publications and media companies.民眾的集體聲音應該決定什麼是有新聞價值的，而不是由少數幾家媒體公司決定 
00:39:48 Elon Musk said we can't have an AI built on a throne of lies.馬斯克說人工智慧不能建立在謊言之上。 
00:42:04 Elon Musk has been waiting two years for a permit for a simple tunnel under a river. Because it's a federal river。只為一條簡單的河下隧道的許可證。馬斯克已經等了兩年。因為是聯邦河流 
00:44:00 Elon Musk’s prediction on eduction integrated with Ai.馬斯克對人工智慧在教育領域的預測 
00:46:23 What's the best advice for your children? Be a good man.給孩子們的最好建議是什麼？做個好人。 
00:47:03 Elon Musk’think that the dangers of nuclear power are greatly overstated.伊隆馬斯克認為核能的危險被嚴重誇大了。 
00:48:18 Elon Musk gave some discussions on Space Force and spy satellite. 伊隆馬斯克對美國太空軍隊和間諜衛星的看法 00:49:37 the challenge of falling global birth rates and American birth rates. 伊隆馬斯克談全球出生率下降和美國出生率的挑戰。 
00:51:33 we definitely want to get rid of this ridiculous notion that there are too many humans on Earth. 我們絕對要擺脫這種荒謬的觀念，認為地球上的人類太多了。 
00:53:04 Elon Musk gave answers why he so involved in politics this time? 伊隆馬斯克回答為什麼他這次如此積極參與政治？ 
00:57:42 Elon Musk recommend posting any evidence that you have for voting fraud or irregularities or causes of concern, just post it on the X platform. 伊隆馬斯克建議在在X平臺上，釋出任何你擁有的關於投票欺詐、違規的證據 
00:58:18 Elon Musk think we should not have computers do voting tabulation at all. 伊隆馬斯克認為我們不應該讓計算機計算選票 
00:58:37 we should have paper ballots only. It should be in-person voting with ID and a story. 美國人應該只使用紙質選票。投票應該是親自進行，並需出示身份證。 
00:58:57 Some people claim that you're hurting Tesla's brand and sales by supporting Trump. 伊隆馬斯克回應支援特朗普，是否會損害特斯拉的品牌和銷量。 
00:59:54 Elon Musk sure hope we don't have to make a X phone, the idea of making a phone makes me want to die. 伊隆馬斯克不想製造X品牌的新手機。 
01:03:04 what I see on the left is a lot of shallow empathy, sort of empathy that's skin deep, essentially, very thin empathy.伊隆馬斯克在左派看到的是很多膚淺的同情，一種膚淺到只有表面的同情，非常薄的同情。 
01:01:27 Elon Musk wanna fix issues on homeless and violent drug zombies on street 伊隆馬斯克對街頭流浪者和毒販的看法 
01:04:00 How to face war and peace in this world 如何面對戰爭，馬斯克對戰爭的看法 
01:11:29 How can we better use our funding federally to make sure our students in public school receive a proper education that prepares them for the workforce without the misallocation of taxpayer federal funding that the students seem to not be benefiting from anyway?我們如何更好地利用聯邦資金，以確保公立學校的學生獲得適當的教育，讓他們為進入職場做好準備，而不會因為稅收聯邦資金的錯誤分配而導致學生似乎根本沒有受益？ 
01:13:15 we need to have an incentive for excellence where there's reward for excellence and there's punishment for failure. 我們需要對政府僱員有激勵機制，獎勵卓越，懲罰失敗。 
01:15:22 what advice do you have for young men today? 伊隆馬斯克對今天的年輕男性有什麼建議？ 
01:15:55 Elon Musk points out the only thing that causes inflation is government overspending because the checks never bounce. 伊隆馬斯克指出導致通貨膨脹的唯一原因是政府過度支出 
01:23:25 Elon Musk strongly believe with respect to any kind of gender surgeries, there should not be any permanent changes to children.伊隆馬斯克尊重任何型別的變性手術，而不應該對孩子進行任何永久性的變性。 
01:24:04 Allowing a child to do something crazy during their teenage years that affects them for the rest of their lives is not doing good for that child at all.允許一個孩子在青少年時期做一些瘋狂的事情，這將影響他們一生, 對這個孩子一點好處都沒有。 
01:24:30 what Elon Musk think education and college in particular is the best,伊隆馬斯克討論大學期間應該學習什麼專業最重要 
01:29:59 what's the Elon Musk you want to build?伊隆馬斯克想要的未来 
01:30:44 why hasn't Tesla bought Rivian? 特斯拉為什麼不收購Rivian？
 

 
Elon Musk Takes Questions From Voters At Campaign Event In Pennsylvania(Full 60 Minutes Q&A Session)
 
[Cheering] Hello everyone! [Cheering] Welcome! Welcome to the Team America rally! [Cheering] So... And, uh... I love you too. Um... [Chuckles] Alright, so, uh, let's see. Um, what should I say? SpaceX does rock! [Chuckles] Indeed. Um, actually I'm pretty excited about the possibility of SpaceX, you know, and just generally becoming a space-faring civilization,

going beyond where we went in the past with the... where we went to the moon. It's crazy that we went to the moon, over 50 years ago was the last time anyone went to the moon. And a lot of people think we didn't go to the moon, but we did. We did. [Chuckles] The Soviets would have called us out on that one if we hadn't gone to the moon. They would have called bullshit on that one. A hundred percent. But... Yeah, yeah, we need to go back to...

We should not just go back to the moon, we should have a moon base. You know? Like, moon base alpha, you know, like an actual base with like a science station. That would be sick. You know, and like, I think we want to become a multi-planet species and be out there among the stars. We want to make Starfleet real. You know? So that like, I mean like, you should be able to go to Mars if you want to go to... I mean, go to Mars. It'd be like, amazing, you know?

Well, it'll take six months. [Chuckles] So, Mars is far. But we can do it. We can create a base on Mars. And ultimately build a city on Mars and make life multi-planetary. I think that would be super cool. Yeah, I mean... [Applause] I mean, you know, life can't just be about like, you know, solving one miserable problem after another. There have to be things that inspire you, that excite you about the future, that you look forward to, you're like, "Wow, that's going to be cool."

And I think being a space-faring civilization and, you know, having a city on Mars and going out there exploring the moons of Jupiter, ultimately getting to other star systems, would be incredibly exciting. And suddenly you're like, "Wow!" You could really look forward to that. That'd be like, I don't know, incredible. So, you know, go out there and find like, maybe alien civilizations. You know, like in Star Trek, you know, go where you've never gone before. So, yeah, let's make Starfleet real. Yeah. [Applause] Meanwhile, back here on Earth... [Laughter] We need to... I think we definitely need to get President Trump re-elected. [Laughter] [Applause] So, that is, I think, incredibly important.

And, I mean, I think America is great, but we want to be greater. And we want to do amazing things. And we don't want, like, the Apollo program to be our high-water mark. We want to do great things in America. And I think we also want to preserve what has made America great. You know, so things like freedom of speech, you know, like... [Applause] You know, the right to bear arms, these things in the Constitution that are actually, you know, important. You have to say, why did they add these amendments to the Constitution? It was because in the places that people came from,

if you said what you wanted to say, you'd be put in prison or you'd be killed. And they took everyone's guns away so that, you know, they couldn't rebel against oppressive government. That's the whole idea behind taking the guns away. So, I'm a big believer in the Constitution. Big believer in, you know, what makes America great. And then we also need, like, some obvious things. Like, we need actual secure borders. [Applause] It's like, you know, you're not a country if you don't have, like, a border. Like, what does it even mean to be a country at that point, you know?

And I went to the border just to see what my cell phone was like. And it was like, it's like World War Z at the border. You know, like, this is crazy, man. So, obviously, I'm in favor of immigrants that-- So, you know, the insane government spending is driving the country into bankruptcy. And, you know, just like a person, if you spend too much, you eventually go bankrupt. The federal debt's growing by a trillion dollars every three months. I mean, it's--our defense budget is pretty gigantic. It's a trillion dollars. But the interest that we owe on the debt is now higher than the defense budget.

Over a trillion dollars and growing. This is not sustainable. So we have to do something about that or the country's going to go bankrupt. So that's an essential thing, too. Yeah, so that's why we need the Department of Government Efficiency. [cheers and applause] D-O-G-E. That's on a brass plaque on a desk. It's going to be amazing. So, you know, it's--yeah, exactly, as people were saying, it's just like it's common sense stuff.

And, you know, America really just needs--it needs to remain the land of opportunity, the land where your success is a function of how hard you work and your talent. Like, if you're talented and hardworking, that should be the only thing that determines whether you are successful. That's it. You know? And America's also supposed to be the land of freedom. That means personal freedom. Like, the government should not be imposing all these rules on people. And, you know, it's like--you know, yeah.

So government overreach is not cool. Freedom, freedom, yeah, exactly, Twitter files. I mean, it was just nutty. You know, people don't realize just how much government involvement there is in the media and, like, how much the government influences the media. I mean, it's crazy how, you know, you'll see--like, in fact, I think, like, whoever's manipulating the media should mix it up a bit because they're really not doing a great job. Like, you know, when they--a week before the debate between Biden and Trump, and, like, everyone on the media was saying Biden was sharp as a tack. Sharp as a tack, sharp as a tack, sharp as a tack, sharp as a tack.

Like, you should mix it up a little. Get a thesaurus. Okay? The NBC media puppets were just all saying exactly the same thing. So, you know, it's just kind of strange. Like, do they all just get the same memo at the same time? I don't know. My comment is--I want to see the group text, okay? Like, is there, like, an email copy list or what? You know, everyone say the same thing at the same time.

Yeah, just total puppets. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, totally. So, well, let's see. Like, you know, what I think--what I find is really engaging is when people are able to ask questions or make comments. And so if anybody wants to--you know, try to keep the comments, like, reasonably short. Any monologue should be ideally kept to, you know, less than a minute. So just far away, and I'll try to answer questions and, you know, respond to

comments. Well, yeah, sure. So, hi. My question is what makes you so interested in politics now? Why is this so important? Yeah, that's a great question. Okay, don't bring the mic that close. Whoa. Yeah, the question is why politics now versus in the past I really have not been meaningfully involved in politics.

So the reason is that I think we're at a crossroads. This time I think we're at a crossroads, a fork in the road of destiny. I mean, what I see happening under the sort of Biden-Kamala administration is a level of sort of government overreach and manipulation that is extremely troubling. And I also see really a deliberate attempt to import as many people as possible into swing states like Pennsylvania in order to ensure that there is a permanent one state--that America becomes a permanent one-party state. I mean, the numbers are truly staggering, and the sort of fake legacy media doesn't report on them. The only reason anyone knows about it is if you're on the X platform. But, like, it's crazy. [Applause]

But, I mean, you're seeing, like, basically increases--this is from the government website, by the way, which is run by Democrats. So, like, you're seeing, like, in some cases, like, 700 percent increases in the past three and a half years in illegals in swing states. What a coincidence. And when you're talking about elections that are won or lost by 10,000 or 20,000 votes, and then you bring in 200,000 people, and then you put them on the fast track to citizenship, this is without considering any cheating. This is legalized. If that happens over the next four years, there will be no swing states.

They're importing voters. That is my--I think that's obvious to anyone who looks. And we will have a situation like we have in California, where it's a one-party state. California is a super majority Dem state, and so it's one-party rule. And if you have one-party rule, that's not a democracy. So I think either action is taken now-- [Applause] If there's another four years for--and it's really, like, pointless to even sort of talk about--Cumala's just a puppet of a larger machine. If the machine--I'll just call it the machine--is able to run for another four years,

there will not be any meaningful elections in the future, just like there are in California. And the whole--all of America will be Californicated. Not in a good way. Yeah. Californicated. Ouch. So we don't want--that would be a bad situation. In fact, it will actually be worse than California. The reason it will be worse than California is the one thing that holds California back from being even worse than it is, is that people can move out of California and still be in America. Now, what happens when there's no place to move? It'll be way worse than California.

That's why I think--yeah, exactly. Well, and speaking of Mars, like, what we're seeing, you know, with SpaceX and Tesla and whatnot is that the sort of regulatory oppression year after year is worse and worse. And there's more regulatory agencies created every year, more rules and regulations every year, until eventually everything is illegal. You know, we had our rockets sitting on the pad for two months, ready to fly. How is it possible that SpaceX could build a gigantic rocket faster than the government could move paper from one desk to another? [Applause] So if that trend continues, which it will do unless there's a conscious effort to have deregulation and have sensible regulation, then Mars will be impossible.

We will be forever confined to Earth. So, you know, I definitely think that's a major showstopper, is being so heavily regulated that we are confined to Earth forever. And that would be a sad eulogy. If future aliens see us, they'll come back and say, "They almost made it. Too bad they regulated themselves." [Laughter] "They had the rocket and everything." [Laughter] So I guess, you know, the short answer is I think this is incredibly important. That ironically, you know, there's a lot of people on the Dem side that call Trump a threat to democracy.

I think, in fact, they are the threat to democracy. [Applause] Thank you. [Applause] Hi, Elon. I want to thank you for coming. I'm from deep blue northeast Philadelphia. And I just want to say thank you for all you've been doing, your contributions. And my question is, did you expect the impact that buying X would have on the world and the United States, free speech, even into the America PAC movement? Well, I mean, the reason -- I didn't realize it would have as big of an impact as it's come to have. But the reason I felt that it was important to acquire Twitter was because I could really -- I could feel the walls closing in.

You know, it was outrageous that they suspended the account of a sitting president. You know, I mean, that's insane. [Applause] And I think it was only a matter of time before they suspended my account, frankly. You know, and I'm sure, given the stuff I've said lately, they would have suspended me six weeks of Sunday. [Laughter] So, you know, I mean, really, Twitter and -- well, pretty much all the social media companies and Google and everyone are controlled by far left activists. That's the truth of it. You know, and so then how do you -- well, how do you know what's real when it's all

filtered through a far left San Francisco Berkeley lens? You know, they just manipulate the truth constantly. You can't even find the truth if you Google it, because Google's, you know, put it on page six. I mean, you know, I don't want to pick on Google too much. I mean, I have a lot of friends there. But, you know, it's very easy to tweak the results, because, you know, like the joke goes, like, what's the best place to hide a dead body? Well, second place at Google search results, because nobody ever goes there. So you don't really have to -- in order to, you know, hide information, you don't

have to delete it. You just move it to the second page, and it's just -- people don't go there. Yeah. That would be tough. That's a tricky one. But, hey, at least there's one place where you can find out what's actually going on and what's real, and that's the X platform. [ Applause ] And I want to say, like, you know, we're very rigorous on the X platform about being a fair playing field, a level playing field, being fair to all sides. There's not a single account on the left that's been suppressed.

Not one. No suspensions, nothing. I believe in being fair. You know, once in a while we do get, like, a request for something on the right that's, you know, would be slightly censorious, and we're like, nope, we're not going to do that. So, you know, we are rigorous about being fair. And unlike the prior regime, we are actually fair, and we want both sides to say their piece and to let there be a free debate and let the marketplace of ideas, you know, work and let the best ideas win.

And that's the right thing to do. [ Applause ] >> Hello, Elon. As an IT guy of 26 years, I think one of the smartest things you did was firing most of the Twitter staff. [ Applause ] >> Yeah. >> Everyone's talking about corruption in the election systems, in the DOJ and judicial system. I personally think a lot of that is because of blackmail data stored on government servers. I strongly feel that if we can't control the information that is stored by the three-letter agencies, we will never get control of the country. What are your ideas on things Trump can do to drain the swamp without being overwhelmed by their dirty trick?

>> Well, I mean, as the saying goes, sunlight is the best disinfectant. So I think really just bringing -- making as much information as possible public, available to the public so that you can see what's going on. There's, like, you know -- I mean, I do have a top-secret clearance, but I have to say, like, most of the stuff that I'm aware of are top-secret. Like, the reason to keep it top-secret is because it's so boring. Yeah. I mean, so -- but I think, like, the strong bias with respect to government information should be to make it available to the public. Like, it should be -- let's be as transparent as possible, like, fully transparent.

Unless it's, like, a massive risk to the country, like, it's, like, you know, we don't want to give, like, say, exact instructions on how to make a nuclear bomb or something like that, you know. But unless there's a genuine risk to the country, all information in the government should be public. Yeah. [Applause] Hi, over here. I'm sorry. [Laughter] I know I look like the same girl who just asked. It's hard to tell because I just hear the speakers, so -- Okay. I am Denise's twin who just asked a question.

I'm also from Deep Blue, far northeast Philadelphia in Parkwood. What I would like to ask you is, in applying the same efficiency that you did to removing 80% of the staff at Twitter to the Department of Governmental Efficiency, would you consider hiring Scott Pressler, who is an amazing movement -- Yeah, sure. Absolutely. -- for that efficiency? Yes. And I should say, you know, hopefully if this comes to pass and the Department of Governmental Efficiency is able to take action, we will reduce a lot of government headcount, but we're going to give, I think, like very long severances, like, I mean,

like two years or something like that. Look, just go do something else is what we're going to say. And you'll get paid for two years, you know. So you've got a lot of time to go and figure out something else to do. You know, it's like the point is not to be cruel or to, you know, have people not be able to pay their mortgage or anything. It's just we've got to move people -- we just have too many people in the government sector and they could be more productive elsewhere. [Applause] Hey, Yulon. It is a pleasure. Me and my best friend started a company when we were 21 years old.

We're going to be the next biggest beef jerky company in the U.S., I promise that. But what advice do you have for young entrepreneurs like us to conquer a challenge that seems almost impossible from the beginning? Well, I mean, generally I think, you know, just try to make it a good product or service. And it's not -- it's really that, you know. It's like you have to say, like, what is a useful thing that you could do? Like maximize your usefulness. What is the -- if there's -- like what is that product or service that you want to make? Beef jerky. The best beef jerky.

Okay, great. So you want to make the best beef jerky, just go ahead and do it. And then, you know, you have to sort of just explain to people why it's -- well, first of all, you need to make sure it is in fact the best beef jerky. And then you just need to then explain to people why it is. And so if you have both the reality and the perception of something being the best beef jerky or whatever the product may be, then I think you'll find it will be very successful. And the company is open for review. Check us out. All right.

Sounds good. Hey there, Elon. My name is Josh. I drove down from Luzerne County today, which, by the way, has flipped red by registration. Yes. Nice work, everybody there. Excellent. Yeah. Another fun fact about the northeast part of Pennsylvania, July 3rd, 1778, the largest massacre that ever happened on American soil happened when the colonists, the French, and the natives all fought over that land. And I think it all circles back.

It's now, you know, fracking central. There's a lot of resources there, land, and just beautiful local communities. Yeah. And something that is happening at a rate that is inconceivable, really inconceivable, the centralization of power to global elites and far off, abstracted places that we can't touch. Yeah. What are the ways that we bring that back to local people that can actually have an impact on the ground? Speaking with some people here. Yeah. I totally agree. Do we move the departments around the United States so they're not all in D.C.?

How do we get people on the ground empowered to actually make everyday changes and get people's support? Well, I super agree with you. So I'm against globalist power. Like, I don't think -- I think we should -- like, the U.N. should not have a lot of power. And these, like -- these, like, you know -- He's from the U.N.! It's like, who voted for them? I didn't vote for them. You know, and it's like -- we want power to the people. The power should -- maximum power to the individual. And so, like, you know, if -- like, we should not have any sort of international

treaties that restrict the freedom of Americans. And we should minimize the amount of federal interference at the state level. So it should be, like -- so unless it's at the state level, which is something you can influence, then it really -- agencies at the federal and the national level should have minimal to zero power over you. Yeah. [Applause] Is there a way that we could decentralize data so that consumers own the data? What is the next step towards that? Because I feel like that is what actually gives us our sovereignty back. Well, I guess -- I'm not sure how to decentralize the data. If the data is at least in multiple places, at least you should be able to, like,

locally store the data. I mean, people -- I think individuals should own their own data. You know, I think that's really important. Like, if you want to separate yourself from a social media company, you should be able to take everything with you. So I'm -- basically, I'm in favor of any action that maximizes your freedom and liberty. So, yeah. [Applause] Hey, Elon. Tesla shareholder, owner since 2015. I own an S-Plaid.

Thank you for making that thing because it's awesome. It is fun. It's my daily driver. It's so much fun. But my heart is with SpaceX. And so my question is, how will you, with Trump, be able to deregulate so that we can get more launches and get to Mars? Well, absolutely. That is a major factor for supporting President Trump is that, you know, if the sort of, you know, Kamala puppet machine happens,

there's going to be just more and more regulations. And this over -- you know, slow triangulation by overregulation will continue. But Trump is very enthusiastic about deregulation, which is not to say we don't want any regulation. We just want sensible regulation. And I think if President Trump is elected, we can actually take those actions and we can cut the strings. Like, I feel like America is like Gulliver, you know, tied down by a million little strings. And we need to cut those strings and free the giant.

[Applause] Hey, man. Thank you so much for doing everything you're doing. Welcome. This is going to be a little long, but I think you're going to get a kick out of it. It's a sad story that turns into something funny you'll probably like. So I was mostly a lifelong liberal, sort of like yourself, working digital production marketing stuff. Yeah, I mean, I believe in freedom. Like, I mean, I believe in, like, empathy, like you should care about your fellow human beings, you know, and, you know, and that --

and I believe in, like, free speech, which used to be a thing on the left, and now bizarrely they want censorship. I'm like, what? And thank you for buying Twitter and saving free speech and Babylon B, too. Yeah. That was great, man. Anyway, so I sort of have a case to plead to. Sorry, a little long. Anyway, I can't get into the details because there are legal issues and stuff. But years ago I had my life destroyed by crazy woke people because I was injured. I lived in Los Angeles for about 13 years.

Yep. And when I wanted to seek out, you know, like a court case and stuff, I had someone in the legal system look me straight in the face and tell me, you know, you're not the right kind of white guy. This isn't going to play out well for you. And I immediately was like, what the -- Yeah, what -- that doesn't make any sense. I don't want to swear. Sure. Yeah. And I was like, is it because I'm from Pennsylvania or I'm also Ashkenazi and Jewish or maybe both?

I don't know. Yeah. But I was immediately like, what has happened? And so it put me in a bad spiral and it, like, lost me. I just went crazy. I'm always been an egalitarian person. Yeah. Right. I mean, racism in any form is bad, doesn't matter who it's directed towards. Yeah. [Applause] And I started, you know, becoming more center right instead of liberal, which is -- it's an identity crisis because -- Yeah.

Yeah, it's a big change. Sure. And working in an industry, it's sort of -- like, you understand in our industries, it's -- you feel like an outcast. You don't really know who to talk to, and so it's awkward. So anyway, as a catharsis of sorts, I made this app called Pooper. Okay. And so it lets you put animated pooping animals on your text messages. Okay. And it's been charting for years, so, like, since I made it. It sounds funny. Yeah.

So I think you'd like it just because, you know, sticking pooping animals on, like, Mark Cuban's -- if you're talking to him, you can, like, stick it on his face or his text messages and stuff. Yeah. Right. And so he gets, like, a gorilla pooping on his text message. Yeah. I mean, I saw an interview with Mark Cuban and -- what's her name again? Rachel Maddow. But I couldn't tell which was which. [ Laughter ] So my question is, would you, like -- because this destroyed me, I was really badly injured.

I'm not saying you have to do it. I don't mean to put you on the spot. Would you consider implementing that kind of thing on the Twitter where you could, you know, use -- have a dinosaur monkey throwing poop and put it on top of Mark Cuban's, you know, like, new stupid look that he has? Or a business insider. About probably 5 million people have now heard about the pooper. [ Laughter ] Maybe 10 million. There's a lot of people that are going to watch this. So I think that's some solid publicity right there.

Thank you. >> Thanks for coming. You're going to help us win Pennsylvania and the entire -- [ Applause ] >> Well, I mean, I should say, like, it's incredibly important that everyone here and everyone listening, watching, that you go and get -- make sure your friends, family, yourself are registered to vote. Because the voting registration deadline in Pennsylvania ends at midnight on Monday. So there's only a few days left. And so you just got to be a pest and, like, hound everyone you know to make sure they're registered to vote and the registration is good.

Because it's sort of, you know, a shot clock ends at midnight on Monday. So... >> Go! [ Applause ] >> Now you're going to be the head of the doge. Have you thought about whether AI and blockchain can be used to track every dollar that the government spends, makes people accountable to the very last person, and we know exactly who agreed to a $400 toilet seat? >> Yeah. >> Can we do that? Is that in the set of possibilities? >> Actually, that's a good idea. Because actually trying to make sense of these incredibly complex laws and regulations where, you know, a law gets passed that's, like, longer than Lord of the Rings and no one's actually read the thing.

Like, literally not -- there's not actually one human who's read the whole law. And then that law gets amplified by, you know, 100 times by the regulations that follow. I think the only thing that could comprehend that is an AI, basically. So I think that would actually be a good idea, is, like, saying, okay, AI, just tell us what's actually going on, where is the money getting spent, what does this law actually mean, and simplify it, really. So, yeah. I mean, the amount of government waste that happens is truly staggering. I mean, if you've been exposed to government contracting, it's pretty nutty.

It's, like, beyond -- it's so crazy, it's hard to believe. So, yeah. So I think there's basically a lot of room for improvement there. And the net result will be a significant improvement in, like I said, personal freedom and the standard of living in America. [ Applause ] >> Hi, Mr. Musk. It is such an honor to be here with you. I am actually a former mainstream media journalist. I now teach martial arts in the city of Philadelphia to kids and also in Camden. And I find that the character skills that they need, they get through martial arts,

not so much through the education they're getting. And with my journalism background -- >> That's great. I did martial arts, too. It's great. It is -- it is a very healthy thing for kids to do, I think, yeah. And adults, too. >> Yeah, I will spar you any time. >> My question is I have such, like, a strong desire for truth that I feel like looking at X but also coming to events like this is the only way that I can truly feel that I confidently know what you're saying and how you're saying it, which I appreciate.

What do we do for kids so that when they get older, they can see through it? Because what they're learning now, I think, falls short of not just the character but also their ability to discern their own opinion. >> Well, yeah. That's a good point. I think teaching kids critical thinking is very important. They should be taught critical thinking. It's like a mental firewall. If you teach kids critical thinking at a young age and just, you know, teach them the types of fallacies that they're likely to encounter, the sort of forms of trickery,

like, you know, straw man fallacy or, you know, sort of -- there's, like, the various ways that information -- like, media or people will trick you. And just kind of immunizing kids effectively against that, I think, early on would be a very good thing to do. Basically, just teach kids, like, don't -- be a little -- be skeptical about what you're told. It may be true. It may not be true. Or it may be that often there's a certain percentage chance that it is true. And you want to consider the evidence, you know, weigh the evidence to decide what

is the probability that a certain thing is true or not true. And then when -- obviously when you hear more evidence, then you change the probabilities. I mean, generally, like, I believe in the sort of physics approach to thinking, which is that you're always, like, weighing the probabilities that something is true or not true or that there may be a third explanation. And be very open to new facts changing your mind. [ Applause ] >> For free that helps to promote, like, true journalism through anything, I'd be happy to -- >> Well, thank you.

Well, I think -- I actually think that what we want to move to is really systems like X and other social media platforms, too, hopefully, where you really have the sum of the voice of the people. You know, in times past, we didn't have the technology for this. So the only way to learn news was for it to be filtered through a small number of news organizations and then to be printed in newspapers or broadcast. There wasn't really any way that people could speak to each other or communicate with each other. But now there is. So if -- because people can be online. And I'm a big believer in sort of citizen journalism. And actually being way better.

Way better than -- because, you see, like -- At first citizen journalism may sound like, well, isn't that -- doesn't that mean just a whole bunch of amateurs are doing journalism? No, actually it's way better. Because if you have actual experts in the field saying things, that's way better than a journalist. If you have people who are actually at the event live -- I mean, look at, say, the attempted assassination of President Trump. People are actually at the event live, video. People are reporting it.

That's the kind of thing that is actually far better information than filtering it through a small number of publications, which ends up being controlled by maybe five editors-in-chief. There's like five people that control, you know, the news. And even though there are multiple newspapers, it's, you know, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, you know, a few others. And they decide what is newsworthy. But that should not be how it works. It should be that the voice of the people -- the cumulative voice of the people should decide what is newsworthy. [Applause] Thank you. First off, I want to thank Nicole here.

She's the one that's holding the mic. Really awesome. I know you said you were a little spectrum autistic. I mean, little, sure. Yes. So the only reason I say that is out of every successful person I've ever seen, you are the one person that I can relate to the most. So I'm sorry if I'm over-replaced a little bit. I remember you had stated that you hate the fact that every single time you hire someone for their talent instead of their passion. So I want to be able to say the Galileo test I passed, Xavier passed, Don Lemon

passed, Dark test, SpaceX test, A12, I passed that one. The '95 test, that's the year '95, what you did to be able to do Zip2, I've done that. Slave test, Steve Jobs test, reality goodness test, the reality of actually doing something good instead of just talking bullshit out their ass. The Reid Hoffman test, which he scoffed at you because you were going to be the first man to be able to put life on Mars, but it was going to be a turtle. So now he kind of is walking back on that. But anyways, you guys were good friends. So I want to, I would classify myself, the easiest way is PNS quantum engineer and

my friend Brandon and my wife, Pheo, and Brandon's over there. I want to give you my business card. If you have five seconds. Five seconds. We have to move on to questions. So to answer the question, just to be clear, the goal of the questions is to ask questions that you think the public would be interested in hearing the answer to. To be clear, that is the, that's what we're after. So, you know, it's you want to ask like, well, you're interested in a particular question, but probably there's a lot of people in America and in Pennsylvania that

are also interested in that question. And that those are the kind of questions we're aiming for here. But thank you. I was wondering if you can bring, instead of going to Pittsburgh, to be able to bring to Bethlehem, to Lehigh Valley, to be able to bring that up again. Steel? Bethlehem steel. Sure. The US. Sure. And I know you're looking between, at Pittsburgh. I was wondering if you can look at Lehigh Valley to be able to grow what was, what

made America great. Okay. Well, I mean, I think we do need a lot more local production of steel. There's not enough steel made in America. That is for sure. So, yeah. So let's move. With the emergence of AI and robotics, you've talked a lot about a possible age of abundance. What are some of the steps that you believe should be necessary to lay the foundation that it's more of a utopia for humanity than a dystopia? And why you answer that, would you mind signing an unauthorized biography written by

my six-year-old son and possibly a copy of my Hitchhiker's Guide to Galaxy? Sure. Sure. If it's a first six-year-old, sure. So the biggest thing for development of AI is that it be maximally truth-seeking, which sounds like an obvious thing. But what I see being done with a lot of the major AI companies is not truth-seeking. They're aiming to be politically correct, which means lying, essentially. So I think this is absolutely fundamental. And I mean, like an example being, for example, when Google came out with Google Gemini and people asked which is worse, global thermonuclear war or misgendering Caitlyn Jenner.

And it said misgendering Caitlyn Jenner, which even Caitlyn Jenner said that is not correct. So that is an insane thing for an AI to say, because if you have some sort of omnipotent AI, it could conclude logically that the best way to avoid misgendering is for there to be no humans, because no humans equals probability of misgendering equals zero. So you could get some very dystopian outcomes if you do not have a maximally truth-seeking AI. I think that's very important. That's the reason for xAI. So you can't have an AI built on a throne of lies. Hi, Mr. Musk. My name is Dave Cochran.

I am so ecstatic to be here. I do have the uttermost respect for you, sir. Thank you. I'm going to try to keep I wanted to bring in my sketchbooks. I'm an inventor. They would have been stacked this high, but I'm not here to pitch my ideas. I really want to know, are you going to play a part in the office once we get Trump in there and do things and maybe incorporate the space program in other areas of the country? I tried to move to Florida. My mother's 90. I want to be part of it.

I want to do it right here. I want to bring manufacturing here and the space program. But I'd like to see you involved. That's for sure. Yes, I intend to do a lot of work to improve government efficiency. So I believe this is a very doable, very achievable. So like I said, it's really like we need sensible regulations, but we can't have insane regulations. I mean, when I looked it up, I think there was something like 428 agencies, federal agencies that exist.

That's almost two agencies created per year since the founding of the country. So yeah, exactly. Not to mention the NGOs that -- what's weird about a lot of these NGOs is they're actually funded by the government. So it's like it's a government-funded, non-governmental organization, which is like -- it just ends up being a self-licking ice cream cone. It's like bizarre. How do you shut it off? You have to shut it off at the government level. So yeah, I think there's -- I do intend to -- assuming the President is probably willing, and I think he is,

I intend to play a significant role in making government efficient. I tend to be quite literal, you know. [Applause] And I think it would free up -- I think it would allow for so many things to be done that are incredibly difficult to get done. You know, like the boring company was trying to dig a tunnel, just a road tunnel, under the Colorado River in Texas, and has been waiting two years for a permit for a simple tunnel under a river. Because it's a federal river, it takes two years, and still no end in sight. Yeah, it's ridiculous. Can't get anything done. It's illegal.

On the subject of transparency, January 6th, there were two -- well, there was a single act of -- attempted act of violence where the two pipe bombs at the Democrat and Republican headquarters. The government released a picture of the pipe bomber sitting on a bench, talking on a cell phone. It was time stamped. We know there's video cameras probably every five feet in D.C. Why haven't they announced who the pipe bomber is? Well, maybe he's a federal employee. [Laughter] Maybe. Maybe.

We were clear on Twitter -- some detectives on Twitter, I think, were pretty clear that it was obvious who it was. Can't they just tell the truth? Yeah, I mean, well, I think if President Trump is elected, we're going to get to the bottom of a lot of these things. [Applause] I think it's going to be, like, massive data dump and have at it. Take a look at all the information, you know? So, yeah, so, I mean, maybe there's an innocent -- maybe there's an innocent explanation. Maybe there isn't.

Let's find out. [Applause] Hi, Elon. I know you're a bit busy, but were you to start another company, what would it be? Would it have anything to do with helping more schools be like Astronova? And what is the future of Astronova? Well, I have to say I'm not chomping at the bit to start another company. [Laughter] I have 17 jobs, and then another one, I suppose, with the Department of Government Efficiency. Although I think improving government efficiency will be really helpful in advancing space and a bunch of other things and just freeing, you know, people around the country to, you know, do what they want to do. I think, as far as education is going, I think, actually, AI is going to potentially be a very good educator, you know,

because AI basically will know all the facts and is infinitely patient and can move as fast as you'd like. And I think there's a lot of opportunity for AI teachers to be extremely good. So, thanks. [Applause] Elon, thanks for all you do, and congratulations on getting Booster 12 back to the megazilla. Thank you. [Applause] You know, the SpaceX team is just an incredibly talented team. It's an honor to work with them. Very impressive.

And relating to ECKT, would it be possible to train XAI on federal, state, and local regulations and financial data so that the citizen journalists can investigate and analyze all the finances and all the laws and regulations so that they can help identify the discrepancies that exist? Yeah, absolutely. I totally agree with that. [Applause] I mean, there is this fundamental challenge that happens, which is that laws and rules and regulations are immortal. And so, every year, there's more rules, regulations, and laws, and they don't die because they're immortal. But we're humans. We're immortal, and we do die. So, you get this accumulation over time.

Historically, what has caused a reset of laws and regulations has been war. Now, we'd like to ideally avoid war, but we still need this massive reset of regulations and reduction of regulations, ideally without the forcing function of war. But it is an interesting thing that the longer that there is peace and prosperity, the more rules and regulations will accumulate until eventually everything is legal. So, that's why I think it is essential that we have a very conscious effort to reduce the laws and regulations, or eventually no one will be allowed to do anything. [Applause] Hey, Elon. I'm Lucas, and I have a question for you. What's the best advice for your children?

[Laughter] Best advice for the kids. Well, generally, my advice is just to try to be as useful as possible to society. You know, be a good person and just try to give more than you take. You know, that's a big deal. [Applause] Hi, Elon. I'm curious, with the explosion of AI and ML, what your thoughts are on reforming the Nuclear Regulatory Commission so that we can provide all the electricity needs not only for hyperscalers, AI and ML, but also to make electricity more affordable for citizens. Yeah. In fact, I think that the dangers of nuclear power are greatly overstated. You know, so I think that we should, especially with the latest technologies,

I mean, you can actually make a nuclear reactor where it is literally impossible to melt it down if you tried to melt it down. Like, if your goal was to melt down this nuclear reactor, the new designs, you will not succeed. You know, you can go in there with a flamethrower and whatever. It doesn't matter. And bomb the place. It doesn't matter. It's still not going to melt down. So if you're in a situation like that with advanced nuclear reactors, then there shouldn't be any regulatory issues with that. Because what really matters is the safety of the public. So I think that there should be significant reform on the nuclear front.

Mr. Musk, my name is Dave. Excuse the patch. I had Mohs surgery a couple of days ago. It's super embarrassing. It took a lot to get up here with that. I integrate AI into businesses and we have to use open AI right now because they're the only API. And so we have to train it like crazy to get it not to do woke things. Hoping that Grok has an API soon. We'll be releasing the API very soon. Oh, awesome. Okay, great. My cyber truck drove me here this evening, my son and I. So thank you for that product. And my question is Space Force. I'm assuming there's been some discussions with President Trump about Space Force.

And I'm just curious if he does win. Obviously, Doge. Yes. Awesome. But secondly, what do you think Space Force might look like in 10 years? I think Space Force should really aim higher. I think when the public hears Space Force, you sort of think Star Trek, Starfleet Academy. You don't think let's make a slightly better spy satellite. But the way that Space Force is interpreted by the military currently is let's make a slightly better spy satellite. That's like 5% better. I'm like, no, that's not what people want. People want Starfleet Academy. We want the Star Trek Enterprise.

And that's what people want. A real Space Force where it's like we're actually in space. So that's why I mean like we want to aim to have like a permanently crewed base on the moon. We want to have the city on Mars. We want to be exploring the moons of Jupiter, the asteroid belt, the entire solar system. And if you decide that you want to go to Mars, you should be able to go to Mars. That would be super exciting. A real space-faring civilization would be fantastic. [Applause] Hi, Elon. You've spoken about the challenge of falling global birth rates and American birth rates.

Is that something you've spoken to Donald Trump about? And it seems like the richer we get, the worse it gets. And you can't really pay people to have more. Nothing seems to work. What ideas do you have for that? And is that something that you have spoken to him about? Thank you. I have mentioned it to him. And it is a quandary. Like as you know, if you look at the sort of the rise and fall of civilizations, you realize that actually what ended up--what ended most civilizations was a low birth rate. That is just an extended period of prosperity seems to cause birth rates to plummet.

And it is somewhat counterintuitive. When a society is under stress, birth rates increase. So if you look at, say, ancient Rome, the birth rates were super high when they were fighting the Carthaginians. And Rome's very life was at stake. Birth rates were all-time high. After they defeated Carthage and ruled the Mediterranean, the birth rates plummeted. And to such a degree that Julius Caesar even tried to pass laws like in 50 B.C. or something like that to give an incentive for any Roman citizen that would have a second or third child. So they were having birth rate issues in 50 B.C., which is pretty wild. And that was also true of really basically every civilization throughout history. It says how do you avoid this birth rate collapse, the trap of--it's a sort of

prosperity trap. I don't have a great answer for that, except I think if we can at least bring it to conscious awareness that we need to continue as a civilization, like no humans, no humanity. And at least it's a topic of conversation. It's like, hey, it's something we should do something about. And we definitely want to get rid of this ridiculous notion that there are too many humans on Earth. This is false. You know, there's a lot of people who think that the environment can't sustain this number of humans. It's totally untrue.

We could double the population of birth and still not have a significant environmental impact. So, you know, it's--like, you could fit all of the humans on one floor in the city of New York. So that's--like, 8 billion humans sounds like a lot, but actually, you know, if you're--say, take-- if you're in an airplane and you're going from here to L.A. or wherever, and you look down, how often do you see a human? You know, if your goal was to drop a ball on a human while flying from here to L.A., you'd have a hard time. So the actual density of humans is very low, and Earth's capable of easily having far more humans and should, in my opinion. [Applause] Hi, Elon. It's an honor to speak with you, and I just want to personally thank you for buying Twitter and saving free speech.

You're welcome. [Applause] So a couple months ago, I was tired of being a keyboard warrior. I signed up to be a Trump Force 47 captain. [Applause] And I knocked over 200 doors, just trying to get people to get out and vote for our president. Great. Thank you. That's super important. I mean, you know, as was asked to me at the beginning of this talk, you know, why am I so involved in politics this time?

It's because I think this time it's a fork in the road, and it's--I think--frankly, I think we're doomed. If Trump doesn't win, I think we're doomed. We're in the doom loop at that point, so he's got to win. And I think for those who are in areas that are, you know, sort of normally these, like, deep blue areas, if you think you won't get assaulted, put a Trump Vance sign on your lawn. I mean, a lot of it is, like, people are, like--they need social proof. They need evidence that other than--that they're not alone. And so probably a lot of people in these, like, normally blue areas would actually

vote for Trump if they thought someone else was voting for Trump, too. And so if you just put the sign on the lawn and be sort of loud and proud, then I think people will be like, you know what, I think I'll vote for Trump, too. [Applause] So I have a rhetorical question. Can you buy Disney and fire David Muir? [Laughter] Now, that's a real interesting idea. [Laughter] So DEI has become a cancer in our corporations. It really has. And I was wondering if there's anything realistically that the federal government can do or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to put a stop to this. Yeah, I think the government should be actively saying that it is illegal to

discriminate on the basis of race, gender, or anything else other than merit. It is illegal. That's--it's not right. [Applause] It's not morally right. It's not legally right. And it doesn't matter who you're discriminating against. The point is not to have discrimination but a different type of discrimination. The point is to not have discrimination. That's the whole idea. [Applause] Elon, first of all, thank you for all you're doing and thank you for being you. [Applause]

I appreciate the kind words. Thank you. In the book, All the Glitters, the mystery behind the glitter conspiracies is revealed and the details of Mission X is exposed, where SpaceX is utilized to deposit a layer of glitter above the atmosphere which deflects the red and infrared light away and cools the planet. My understanding is that this is sort of being kept secret because you don't want environmentalists or other people to come in and regulate and stop it from happening. Why isn't the public being made aware that it is essential that Donald Trump be elected for this to happen because Trump will not have to ask permission to save the planet, he'll just do it. I'm just wondering if you feel the same sentiment. There's also been some rumors on the internet that you're going to not only do this but then you're going to use it and charge the other countries of the world to support it. You're going to lower the deficit and other sources of income and there'll be no more wars between electric vehicles and oil and fossil fuels.

Why won't you tell people, "Elect Trump and this will happen," because if it's just anybody but Trump, regulations or... It only takes one person to complain and it won't happen. I think it's for sure true that when we've got so many regulatory agencies and there are so many rules and regulations, basically Washington, D.C. is like a sea of brake pedals. Everyone's got a brake pedal but nobody's got an accelerator. We're going to add some accelerators. All they want to do in D.C. is stop anything. I just call it a sea of brake pedals, brake pedals in all directions. How can you make progress if you've got a sea of brake pedals?

It's not possible. We're going to get rid of a bunch of the brake pedals and add accelerators. My question was how do we stop the steal? Is there a way to have a database on X where we can track all the votes? We all send our votes to you to track it and then we can tell who wins? There's so much, even down in Georgia right now, they're already flipping votes on the machines. How do we stop the steal? I recommend posting any evidence that you have for voting fraud or irregularities or causes of concern, just post it on the X platform and then people can support it or say either support it or debunk it, one of the two.

I do think there's generally an issue that we have, a fundamental issue, which is unless we have voter ID-- [applause] My opinion is we should have no-- I say this as a technologist who likes technology and I like computers, but we should not have computers do voting tabulation at all. [applause] It's far too easy to hack a computer. I know how to hack a computer. Government software is the easiest thing to hack. It's not the best software. In my opinion, we should have paper ballots only. It should be in-person voting with ID and a story.

[applause] Hi, Elon. Thank you for everything you do. Feel free to answer this question in three words. Some people claim that you're hurting Tesla's brand and sales by supporting Trump. What do you say to those people? [laughter] Well, I mean, you know, Tesla's sales are actually doing great. [applause] We're hitting all-time highs. I think, you know, really people care about the quality of a product as opposed to whether they agree or disagree with the CEO's views. I mean, the CEO of any given company is going to have political views. But at the end of the day, what matters is that Tesla makes a great product

and people like buying great products. So that's it. [applause] Hello. Hi. Thanks for coming and being here. I think I understand your vision for challenging the existing cell phone syndicate. But I want to know when the X phone's coming out. [laughter] Man, I sure hope we don't have to make a phone. That's a real--that's a lot of work. I mean, if, you know, if there's like--I mean, yeah, well, the idea of making a phone makes me want to die.

[laughter] So--but if we have to make a phone, we will, but we all aspire not to make a phone. You know, I do think that, you know, the various companies, you know, Apple and Google, Android and whatnot, you know, they need to make sure they don't have a heavy hand in, like, the App Store and whatnot, or they will create a forcing function for there to be a competitor. So--but man, I sure--the idea of--I dread the idea of making a phone. But if that turns out to be necessary, we'll do it. But hopefully it is not necessary. Yeah, so--all right.

Hey, Elon. First things first is that JCal is on my cap table. All right, great. And my question is, I grew up in Spain, right near where your brother got married. Oh, cool. And--in Empudias. And comparing cities back home to cities here, it's incomparable. How does one fix--you know, I go to our great city of Philadelphia. How does one fix the problem of people living on the streets? It's not talked about enough. It isn't. No, I agree.

I go to Kensington a lot, and it's just--it is such a horrible sight, seeing these poor people. At what point do you have the freedom to slowly carry yourself like that on the streets, and how do you fix that? Well, I think there's not an easy answer to that. But I think you cannot have open-air drug bazaars because obviously that's going to be a magnet. And, you know, while most people can resist the lure of drugs, some people cannot. And, you know, you just cannot have--that there be easy access to drugs and have it just be open--they're on the street. Then there are also situations where somebody is just fundamentally mentally ill, like not a little bit, you know, like I mean mentally ill in a dangerous way,

dangerous to others. And I think if somebody is incurably mentally ill and a danger to others, we need to have some kind of asylum for them. There's no--it has to be done. The word "homeless" is a misnomer. Because "homeless" sounds like someone who got a little behind on their mortgage payments, and if they just got a job offer, they'd be back on their feet. That does not describe the people in Kensington, okay, at all. So if the issue is--like, basically if there are violent drug zombies, they must be taken off the streets, and they want to go willingly.

So there's no choice. Now, I'm a big believer in empathy. I think we should have empathy for our fellow human beings. But what I see on the left is a lot of shallow empathy, sort of empathy that's skin deep, essentially, very thin empathy. They have empathy for what they term "homeless people" when they're actually violent drug zombies, but they lack empathy for the victims of the violent drug zombies. And so we should have deep empathy for everyone, not shallow empathy. Have empathy for the victims of the criminals, not just the criminals. [applause] Hi, Leon. My name is Hans Moyer.

I brought some plans here to solve all our problems. I'm going to give them to this young lady here. I have some good news. The Washington Times, the most conservative voice in our capital, endorsed President Trump for another term, so that's good news. Great. My question today to you is when your children come to you and they ask you why is so much war in our world, what do you answer them as far as where does peace begin? Well, the reality is actually, if you say war per capita, it's actually quite low. It's not that there's no war, it's just that we now hear about war anywhere at all.

But if you compare where we are today versus, say, last century with World War II and World War I, where millions of people were dying per year, we actually have on a global basis, it's actually very peaceful. That does not say there aren't some terrible things happening somewhere. There are 8 billion people on Earth. In fact, what the legacy mainstream media tends to do is try to answer the question, what is the worst thing that happened on Earth today? That's generally what the newspaper tries to answer. What's the worst thing that happened on Earth? It's a big world. There's some pretty bad things.

So actually, the reality is that there is only a small amount of war occurring in the world compared to the past. And historically, humans have had a lot of war, of course. But I think actually for countries, say, like the United States, the issue is that we've had peace for such a long time that we are a victim of prosperity. When you have peace for such a long time, you have this accumulation of rules and regulations that binds society. That's why I call it the slow strangulation by overregulation is what happens in peacetime, and a dramatic decline in the birth rate. And the decline in the birth rate,

it's not something we've ever evolved to react to. If you said that there was like a Thanos situation where somebody would snap their fingers and half of people would be dead, you'd be like, "Well, that's terrible." That's what's happening with the birth rate. Yet there is no reaction. Why is there no reaction? At the end of the day, you still have half the people. I mean, look at, say, South Korea. Birth rate is one-third replacement. One-third. That means, if you fast-forward to the future, two-thirds of South Korea is gone. Poof, gone.

More than Thanos. Why is there no reaction? Why are we not reacting to the absence of children? We should have, in my opinion, just as strong a reaction to the absence of children as to the death of humans. Because in both cases, the people are gone. [applause] Hey, Elon. How are you doing? Great job saving Twitter from the woke mind virus. And I don't know if you're a gamer, but-- I am. What gave it away? [laughter] Because I do post frequently on the subject. Yeah. Very nice to meet you.

I do actually love it. People ask me, "What are your hobbies?" Well, I talk to my friends and family, and I play video games. Yeah, I left my Diablo 4 to come here. Yeah, exactly. But the gaming industry is starting to see some results, too, of being a victi 查看全部

公司简介：
Onedor INC. 是一家位于美国纽约 Franklin Square 的电子商务公司。我们是一家正在不断发展的品牌，在 Amazon.com 上拥有强大的影响力。
职位：
我们目前正在招聘一名电子商务经理，负责管理我们的 Amazon 电子商务平台，专注于特定的产品类别。
岗位职责：
负责 Amazon 第三方卖家账户和 Amazon Vendor 账户的运营，广告投放和优化，确保商品陈列、价格更新、促销和内容更新的正确执行。 优化产品列表，提高销售业绩和在线销售转化率，实施数字营销策略，提升网站流量。 分析销售与营销报告，进行绩效营销分析和投资回报率优化，提升运营效果。 进行例行账户维护，及时解决运输、库存和订单问题，确保业务顺畅。 管理并执行社交媒体及其他电子商务平台的推广策略。 发现并抓住新的电子商务机会，推动品牌的持续增长和市场扩展。任职要求：
精通英文书面和口头沟通，英语水平需达到母语水平。需具备普通话双语能力，基本中文语言能力为必备条件。 对电子商务领域充满热情，拥有长期职业发展的愿景。 熟练使用 Microsoft Office，尤其是 Word 和 Excel。 熟悉 Facebook、Twitter、Instagram 等社交媒体平台。 细致入微，积极主动，拥有正面的工作态度，具备团队合作精神和职业责任感。 具备在美国合法工作的资格。薪酬待遇将根据经验进行协商，并在面试中与候选人讨论。
如果您是一位积极主动、注重细节并对电子商务充满热情的求职者，欢迎申请 Onedor INC. 提供的这一令人激动的职位机会！
有兴趣的求职者请将简历发送至 [email protected]。期待您的加入！ 查看全部

我们是一家高端医美诊所，致力于提供最新的美容和皮肤护理服务。现因业务发展需要，诚邀有经验的美容师加入我们的团队。
职位要求：
• 至少1年美容行业工作经验
• 熟悉皮肤护理、微整形、美容仪器等相关技能
• 具备良好的沟通技巧和服务意识
• 具备团队合作精神，能适应快节奏工作环境
• 持有相关美容执照者优先
我们提供：
• 具有竞争力的薪酬及奖金制度
• 全职/兼职均可，工作时间灵活
• 定期培训机会，提升职业技能
• 温馨、专业的工作环境
工作地点：13616 35th Ave 法拉盛
纽约市，Q-Cell Med Spa
有意者请发送简历至 [email protected] 或致电 347-738-3410 咨询详情。
Q-Cell Med Spa 招聘美容师
我们是一家高端医美诊所，致力于提供最新的美容和皮肤护理服务。现因业务发展需要，诚邀有经验的美容师加入我们的团队。
**职位要求：**
- 至少1年美容行业工作经验
- 熟悉皮肤护理、微整形、美容仪器等相关技能
- 具备良好的沟通技巧和服务意识
- 具备团队合作精神，能适应快节奏工作环境
- 持有相关美容执照者优先
**我们提供：**
- 具有竞争力的薪酬及奖金制度5000-9000/月
- 全职/兼职均可，工作时间灵活
- 定期培训机会，提升职业技能
- 温馨、专业的工作环境
**工作地点：13616 35th Ave Flushing
纽约市，Q-Cell Med Spa
有意者请发送简历至 [[email protected]]或致电 5182998999咨询详情。 查看全部

 
 


 
 
 馬斯克賓州拉票最新30分鐘演講時間軸 
 
0:00 The reason I'm here in person is because Pennsylvania is so important to the future of the world. 馬斯克講述來賓夕法尼亞的原因 

0:23 the linchpin in this election. this election is gonna decide the fate of America, along with the fate of America. 馬斯克認為2024年美國總統選舉將決定美國的命運，以及美國未來的命運.

0:45 Anyone who's against those things is fundamentally anti-American. And the hell with them. 馬斯克說反對美國價值觀的人都是反美，反美的人應該下地獄. 

1:02 I lived in this city for three years. I went to school here. 馬斯克在賓州生活過3年，在這裡上學。 

1:55 Democratic Party will not put hardened criminals in prison. 馬斯克認為民主黨不會把頑固的罪犯放進監獄。 
3:42 I just wanna make sure that people who come here are gonna be assets to society. And that they're gonna raise our standard of living. 馬斯克認為美國新移民必須能夠對社會有所貢獻，他們能夠提高美國的生活水平。 

4:24 The federal government is spending America into bankruptcy. And that's really what leads to inflation is that when the government spends more than it brings in, that's what causes inflation. 聯邦政府正在使美國陷入破產，而且這就是導致通貨膨脹的原因，政府花費超過其收入。
 
5:21 The second amendment is there to protect the first amendment. As soon as the government can disarm the people, they can do anything they want. 美國第二修正案是用來保護第一修正案的。一旦政府可以解除人民的武裝，他們就可以為所欲為。
 
6:52 I think we see this election decided in Pennsylvania by, it could be 10,000 votes, it could be 1,000 votes, it could be 10 votes. 馬斯克認為賓夕法尼亞州的票選結果，可能是10,000票，也可能是1,000 票，或者是10票的差距 
 
8:19 what can the average citizen do to help train AI to be truth-seeking? 馬斯克回答選民提問：普通 公民能做些什麼來幫助訓練AI成為尋求真相的存在？ 

10:43 some amount of cheating that takes place. 馬斯克回答選民提問：如何杜絕大選舞弊行為? 

12:23 what do you think about we stop giving money to other countries such as Israel, Ukraine, and we stop funding forever wars。 馬斯克回答選民提問：如何停止給以色列、烏克蘭永無止境的戰爭資金 

13:07 there's a lot of money that's being spent where sort of illegals are getting more benefits than citizens. 馬斯克認為有很多資金被花費在一些非法移民身上，他們獲得的福利比美國公民還要多。
 
13:49 If you have incentives for excellent work, by the same token, if someone's not doing excellent work, they're exited, just like normal. 馬斯人討論如何提升政府工作效率 

15:57 Eliminate Hamas. Rebuild Gaza like we helped rebuild Japan and Germany. 消滅哈馬斯。 停止仇美教育，像重建了日本和德國一樣重建加沙 
19:07 they just replaced the Biden puppet with the Kamala puppet. 馬斯克認為拜登和卡馬拉只是傀儡 

20:31 Elon musk’s views on cheating on voting machines. 馬斯克回答觀眾提問：如何應對投票機器欺詐 

24:00 We have so many regulatory, last time I checked, we have 428 regulatory 馬斯克討論美國政府機構臃腫問題 

24:34 Pennsylvania's rich of natural resources and fracking gas and lithium, How can we ensure that while utilizing these resources, we work closely with local governments and residents without the federal government overreaching and forcing land from homeowners? 賓夕法尼亞州富含自然資源、壓裂氣和鋰，我們如何能確保在利用這些資源的同時， 與地方政府 和居民緊密合作，而不讓聯邦政府幹預並強行佔用房主的土地？

26:23 Corporations are like people. Like some people are good peoples. Some corporations are good, some are meddling. 馬斯克討論私人企業治理問題 

31:41 We got fined $140,000 by the EPA for dumping fresh water on the ground, drinking water. 馬斯克被美國環保署罰款140,000美元，因為把飲用水冷卻發射臺。
 
35:28 Could you give us three top reasons why people should vote for Donald Trump? 馬斯克給出三個頂級理由，人們為什麼應該投票給唐納德·特朗普？
 
 
Elon Musk Full English Language Speech in Pennsylvania :

As you can see, I’m obviously here in person. This is me, not a clone of me. The reason I’m here in person is because Pennsylvania is so important to the future of the world. You show what matters by your actions, not your words. And my actions are I’m here, I’m in Pennsylvania, and I’m here for a very important reason, which, yeah. It’s which is, I can’t emphasize enough that Pennsylvania is, I think, the linchpin in this election. And this election, I think, is gonna decide the fate of America, along with the fate of America,

the fate of Western civilization. The two should be upheld. Told at times that these are like right-wing values. I’m like, are you insane? This is literally the fundamental values that made America what it is today. And anyone who’s against those things is fundamentally anti-American. And the hell with them. (audience cheering) Yeah. So I actually lived in Pennsylvania for three years, by the way. I’m no stranger to the state.

I lived in this city for three years. I went to school here. I know the state. I’m not some just-arrived situation. I’ve been here, spent three years of my life here. It’s a great state, love it. And yeah, it was also, the thing is, I was talking to friends of mine who, like when I went to Penn, it was very dangerous at the time. But everyone thought it would get better over, it would get better as the years went on.

And one of the issues was there were students who would get killed from time to time. And that was pretty bad, obviously. And I was talking to someone who recently graduated from Penn and they said, “Actually, it’s worse.” And I’m like, “It’s worse? “What the hell is going on?” Yeah, yeah. The reality is that if someone is a violent criminal where they either are unable to control their violence or they like it, if you do not incarcerate them, they will hurt people. That’s what it comes down to. So if you don’t put hardened criminals in jail, they will kill people. That’s what it comes down to.

And that’s, unfortunately, the situation we have here is that the Democratic Party will not put hardened criminals in prison. And so they roam free and they prey upon you and your kids and your family and your friends. This is insane. How can we be the most powerful country in the world and it’s not safe to walk around our cities? What the hell is going on? — George Soros! — Yeah, George Soros, honestly, misanthropic. For someone who has claims to be doing good, but actually he is not. He is tearing down the fabric of society.

Terrible. Yeah, but I think it’s just unbelievable that we, like you should be able to feel safe walking around American cities. And it’s not just Philadelphia has a challenge. New York has a challenge. Every major city in the US, like my mom lives in New York, for example. Three of her friends have been assaulted on the street this year. And it’s getting worse. And now when she takes her dog for a walk, she has to stay inside of the building so that she can call for help if need be.

This is not the future we want. And if we get four more years of this, then we’re gonna be fully Mad Max. And it’s nice to watch a Mad Max movie, but we don’t wanna be in the Mad Max movie, okay? So yeah. And then the whole border thing is just insane. I always wanna try to figure out what is the truth of the matter? What’s really going on? With on the border situation, is it real or is it not real? So I went there in person and I just literally live streamed what I saw.

And our border looks like World War Z, okay? It’s like zombie apocalypse. It’s insane. This is, if you don’t have a border, you don’t have a country. Yeah. I mean, we’re just saying we have to have real borders. And if you don’t have real borders, you don’t have real country. And obviously as someone who’s an immigrant, I’m pro-immigrant. I just wanna make sure that people who come here are gonna be assets to society. And that they’re gonna raise our standard of living. I think the sort of sports team analogy is a good one.

Let’s say you’re a pro sports team, you wanna win the championship, you want to win your team, obviously, ’cause they help the whole team win. So same is true for immigration. If we have this sort of equivalent of Kobe Bryant or Steph Curry or LeBron or something like that, they wanna join the team. Absolutely, of course. They’ll, do you like winning? Yeah, okay. But if they can’t play basketball, they shouldn’t be joining. That’s real important.

And yeah, and then something that doesn’t get a lot of attention is the fact that the federal government is spending America into bankruptcy. The, which is crazy. And that’s really what leads to inflation is that when the government spends more than it brings in, that’s what causes inflation. Yeah, so it’s just a pernicious tax. So there has to be, we have to radically reduce the amount of government spending so that we don’t rack up a debt that is impossible to repay and drive the country to bankruptcy. (audience applauding) I mean, just basic stuff, really. They shouldn’t be controversial topics.

Common sense, exactly. And are you seeing all these attacks on freedom of speech? And they’re like attacking me for freedom. Yo, that’s the first amendment, like literally the first one. It was a, tells me it’s a high priority. And the reason they had the first amendment was because the countries people came from, if you spoke your mind, you’d be imprisoned or killed. That’s why you have it. That’s really important. And then the right to bear arms is also really important.

That’s there to protect. The second amendment is there to protect the first amendment. As soon as the government can disarm the people, they can do anything they want. We’ve seen this in one country after another. They take the guns away from the people, then they do fake elections, and then the people try to protest and they just get shot. That’s what happened in Venezuela recently. That a fake election, Maduro lost, like massively lost, 70% loss. And he’s like, “Oh no, I won.” (laughing) And everyone’s like, “Oh, you didn’t win.”

There were big protests in the street. But the thing is that Chavez, when he came into power, took away everyone’s guns. So now you’re facing soldiers with assault rifles, where you’re gonna throw some sticks at them or something? Use finger guns? It doesn’t work. So Maduro, even though he lost the election, he’s still in power. And that’s the kind of risk that we face. But we gotta do everything possible to protect the Constitution. And I think this is, yeah.

So for all those reasons, that’s why after thinking about it hard, it was very clear to me that Donald Trump has to win this election. It really does. I think the most important thing that you can do, and what I’m asking everyone to do, is make sure that you’re registered to vote, that you, and then vote early. And then talk to your friends and family and everyone you know to make sure that they’re registered to vote, ’cause Monday is the deadline for voting registration. And honestly, this is, if there’s ever a time to be a pest with your friends and family, this is the time.

Just, yeah. This is the time. Everyone you know, everyone you meet, everyone you run into, register them to vote, and then get them to vote immediately. And we only have until Monday night to register to vote. The next, basically, three days are essential. And I think we see this election decided in Pennsylvania by, it could be 10,000 votes, it could be 1,000 votes, it could be 10 votes. It could be some very tiny number. So every incremental person is a huge difference.

I haven’t been politically active before. I’m politically active now because I think the future of America and the future of civilization is at stake. — Yeah, please go all out registering people. We have three days, let’s go. Anything you can possibly do. With that, I’m happy to answer questions or take comments from the audience. Yeah, thank you. — Does this mic work? — We’ll do one question per person, okay? — Yeah, I have a mic.

- Yeah. — First of all, welcome to Ridley Township. — Thank you. — Delaware County. And welcome to Ridley School District and our beautiful high school. Because you made this your first stop, we’d love to make you an honorary Ridley Raider. — Thank you. (audience cheering) — Sports is big in Ridley, big in Delaware County. This is must, 67 counties in Pennsylvania. We gotta turn every one of them red.

- Great, sounds good, thank you. — Thank you very much. — What can all of us here, everybody in this auditorium, everybody watching the live stream, what can we do now to make sure we get Donald Trump across the finish line in Pennsylvania and everywhere else in this country? — Yeah, it’s fundamentally for the next three days, just everyone needs to focus on registering, friends, family, acquaintances, everyone you know. ’Cause if you’re not registered by Monday, that’s why I’m being repetitive about this and really emphasizing this,

anyone not registered by Monday evening or if they’re registered incorrectly, their vote won’t count. They won’t be able to vote. We got three days, it’s all about registration every single day and like I said, this election could be decided by a handful of people. It could just be that a little bit of extra effort on voter registration decides the entire future of civilization. So that’s why I’m saying, man, if there’s ever a weekend to spend going hog wild on registration, this is it. Yeah, Qua. — Thank you so much for being here. It means so much and I think it’s really in line with your character as I’ve come to know you from listening to you speak in interviews.

In addition to voting for Donald Trump, what can the average citizen do to help train AI to be truth-seeking? — Well, I think definitely publicly pushing to ensure that AI is truth-seeking and is not politically correct or which means factually incorrect. That’s a big deal. You can’t just speak out on social media and certainly complain loud when other companies attempt to essentially program their AI with a dystopian San Francisco Berkeley philosophy. And if you wanna know where that philosophy leads, just walk around the streets of San Francisco. But be careful because do not get killed by a violent drug zombie because they’re all over this downtown SF. It’s insane.

So we can see where does that philosophy lead. And unfortunately, I think a lot of the AI is already programmed, at least implicitly, with that misanthropic, dystopian philosophy, yeah. — Right here on your — — Sorry, with the lights in my eyes and stuff, it’s hard to see. — Hi, my name is Jasmine. I’m originally from Malaysia and I’ve been here 20 years. I came here legally. I see a lot of immigration and a lot of immigrants who came here legally.

Trump and they want a strong economy. Oh, by the way, I came here because my daughter goes to school here. She told me to come over. I used to be really active in promoting Trump campaign four years ago and I got burned out and I’m so frustrated. And it’s all because of the cheating. So what are we going to do with that? — There is, I think, some amount of cheating that takes place. It’s hard because when you have mail-in ballots and no sort of proof of citizenship, it becomes almost impossible to prove cheating is the issue. So a lot of people in the Dems say, “No cheating.”

And I’m like, “You’ve made it impossible “to actually prove that there’s cheating.” But statistically, there’s some very strange things that happen that are statistically incredibly unlikely. There’s always this question of, say, the Dominion voting machines. It is weird that the, I think they’re used in Philadelphia and in Maricopa County, but not in a lot of other places. Doesn’t seem like a coincidence. So I think that is, you know. (audio cuts out) It’s too easy to add just one line, paper ballots. So in-person voting, yeah, with the, which by the way, every country has.

I mean, almost every country that has democratic elections requires in-person voting with voter ID. This is weird, it’s super weird to not have that. I think that’s the only way to effectively address fraud. Given that we are where we are today, I think we just need a very big margin of victory. Yeah, if the margin of victory is big enough, then it, as they say, it’s gotta beat the cheat. Yeah, so that’s it. — First off, you’re my hero and I love your sneakers.

- Thank you. — If you do choose to be the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. — Yeah, DOGE. — Yep, what do you think about we stop giving money to other countries such as Israel, Ukraine, and we stop funding forever wars, most likely it’s going to the deep state anyway. — Yeah, I think in general, the amount of waste that happens with the federal government is really staggering. It’s a staggering amount of waste of taxpayer money. And if we’re, if for any given expenditure, we have to say, well, what does this do

for the citizens of America? Like, how is this good for the people of America? That’s, it’s their money. For some weird reason, a lot of people in the sort of state or whatever the politicians, they seem to forget that the money being spent is your money. And if it’s not being spent in a way that is beneficial to the American people, it’s a misuse of the funds. So yeah. And there’s a lot of money that’s being spent where sort of illegals are getting more benefits than citizens. What the heck is that?

That doesn’t make any sense. Yeah. — So as we bring government spending and look inward to our country, I am a government employee. I care about innovation and efficiency. With your vision for a department of government efficiency, what can we do? How can we support you? And also how can we spotlight the needs of people in North Carolina? The body count is abnormally underreported. What can we do to press on that and to support people within our country?

- Sure. I do think that government efficiency is not something about reducing the size of government, but making sure that there are incentives for excellent work. And so if somebody’s, whatever you incent will happen. So if you have incentives for excellent work, by the same token, if someone’s not doing excellent work, they’re exited, just like normal. It’s really what happens in a properly functioning company is that you reward, or think of a sports team. The players that are doing well, they get rewarded, and the players that are not doing well, they exit the team.

And that should just be how it works. And I think that’ll have a profound effect on the effectiveness of government. ’Cause whatever you incent will happen. So if the incentives are aligned with saving people in North Carolina, then that’s what’ll happen. If you have a failed response to the disasters, to the hurricane disasters, and no one even gets fired, well, okay, what do you expect? No one’s gonna take action. If there’s a track record of failure, you have to exit the people who failed.

Otherwise, people will look around, I guess I don’t need to do anything, ’cause nothing bad happens to you, even if you do a terrible job and people die, which is insane. (audience applauding) (audience applauding) — Hey, Ron. Can you tell us about your trip to Israel? — My moving trip. Definitely one of the toughest regions to, like how do you, what set of actions result in the greater good in Israel? And obviously, you obviously cannot have people who, if they wanna slaughter everyone in Israel, you gotta stop that.

There’s no way. Yeah, those people either need to be killed or incarcerated, or they will simply try to kill more Israelis. This is what it amounts to, obviously. And they wanna kill Americans too, by the way. Generally, Israel is referred to as the little Satan and we are the big Satan. That’s what the Ayatollah calls us. So I think a lot of what’s happening there is people are being taught to hate in Gaza from when they’re children, they’re taught to hate. And that’s really the thing that needs to stop for there to be long-term peace, hopefully, is that you just cannot have the kids be taught to hate from the moment they can talk.

That’s fundamental. So I think there’s a three-step process there, which is, you’ve mentioned one has to do the difficult thing, which is to — — Eliminate Hamas. — Yes, eliminate Hamas, exactly. And then, I think also, going forward, anyone who’s teaching hatred in Gaza or elsewhere, they need to stop doing that. That can’t be acceptable. — And we have to stop that. — And we have to stop, yeah, kids being taught to hate America in America. So — (audio cuts out) Prosperity in Gaza.

So this is very difficult. It’s like, how do you, after terrible things have been done, you then have to bring prosperity to Gaza. And that’s the thing that will ensure, provided kids are not taught to hate and there’s long-term prosperity, I think there will be peace in Gaza. And we see an example of that after World War II, where with Germany and Japan, they were defeated, they obviously did terrible things, but changed the education system. And unlike World War I, we helped rebuild Japan and Germany.

The Marshall Plan. Instead of exacting vengeance, America insisted, “We’re gonna help rebuild Germany. “We’re gonna help rebuild Japan.” And now they’re our allies. And there’s been no war ever since. (audience applauds) — Welcome to Delaware County. And I wanna say congratulations on the successful re-docking of your — (audience applauds) — Thank you. (audience applauds) — Thank you. (audience applauds) — I mean, honestly, it was a great week. We had the Tesla sort of cool autonomous car and robot stuff, which I think is gonna be really great.

You know, I think, who wouldn’t want their own personal C3PO R2D2? (audience laughs) It’d be awesome, you know? So I think that we’re gonna build some awesome, helpful robots and autonomous cars. And then, I mean, this is a good day. Faye, Faye, just smiling upon us here. Thank you. We caught the rocket, which is just totally nuts. (audience applauds) You see that rocket booster? It’s the largest, heaviest flying object ever made. And it just got caught by Mechazilla arms.

Karate Kid, but bigger. I catch him in the fly with the chopstick. — So my question is, do you think there is a shadow government behind the Biden-Harris administration? — It’s, we want it this way. It’s not Biden. We know that for a fact. Okay. (audience applauds) The dude’s like barely got two functional neurons. And he just seems to be at the beach a lot. And he’s obviously not in charge.

So when the polls started going low on Biden, he was saying, “Oh, he’s staying in the race, “he’s staying in the race.” But then I guess the real power is that he told them he’s not. — So who is it that’s behind him? We know Obama, okay? But Obama — — He’s the only one. — I’m just as curious as you are. It is, as far as I can determine, there isn’t any one sort of puppet master. It’s more like there’s a thousand or a lot. So I’d like to talk to them to understand more about,

listen, what are your goals, puppet masters? I’m just curious. I mean, maybe, I agree with some of them. It’s possible. It’s just obvious that Biden’s not in charge. It’s obvious that Kamala’s not in charge. Kamala’s, they just replaced the Biden puppet with the Kamala puppet, very obviously. And so you can tell, if the teleprompter stops working, then the puppet stops. And it’s like, “Oh, the puppet just starts looping “‘cause the teleprompter broke.”

I don’t have a teleprompter. I can just talk like a normal human. Yeah, I think it’s not, from what I can tell, it’s not one puppet master, it’s many. But it’ll be interesting to see the crossover between the Epstein client list and Kamala’s puppet masters. I bet there’s a lot of names that appear in both lists. Yeah, Diddy too. Diddy did it. — Elon, my name is Gregory Stenstrom. I’m from here, Delaware, Conn. Two people who know me. In my hands, you asked earlier, you’d like to go to a hand count.

We have three federal suits right now. One, because we know for a fact, and we have proof that the election code and the machines in Dominion and Harland Pacific are fraudulent here, right here in Delaware County. Jonathan Marks admitted this in court last week. — Wow, he did? — In court, on a transcript. — I didn’t read about that. — Well, of course you didn’t. — For some reason, the — — How many people here know me? — But the legacy media didn’t forgot to report about that one.

- How many people here know me? — I usually keep up with these things and I did not know that. — We’re also co-defendants, Leah Hoopes and myself, also from Delaware County, we’re co-defendants with President Trump and Rudy Giuliani in a defamation suit, where we proved over 952 days that there was massive election fraud in 2020. We proved that in court, it’s a matter of public record. We also have the proof that the election machines that are currently being used are fraudulent. We have videos right now that I can show you of ballot boxes being stuffed here in Delaware County, Montgomery County, Chester County, and across the state. We have that video.

We have submitted this to the federal — A SCOTUS case right here, and the SCOTUS case is just simple. It asks the DOJ to rescind their policy not to investigate election fraud. — Which seems crazy. — We are being blocked — — This DOJ is doing a great, I don’t know what, just take the J out of the name. Department of Injustice. — What I’d like you to do, Elon, is I don’t want to take too much time, and I know this is a shock, but we have a book here, “Parallel Election.” I have a Supreme Court case, and I have the federal suits here.

We’ve called your people, we’ve called the people who are supposed to be helping. We have hundreds of people right now, ready. They’re out taking videos, they’re training poll workers, and we are not getting support from many of the people in the first front rows here. And their pictures, if you want to know who they are, are in this book. (audience cheering) — What I recommend is to post content on the X platform, and then people can argue and say it’s right or wrong, or if you have video or evidence, then post them publicly on social media, and then people can judge for themselves exactly. Okay, great, excellent, thank you.

But anyway, let’s not get contentious. I think teamwork makes the dream work here. Whatever the situation, I don’t want to dissuade anyone from voting. It’s very important to vote. Any actions with respect to voting machines or whatnot, we simply want to put them under intense scrutiny, but nonetheless, everyone needs to vote, and like I said, if you leave here with one thing, the goal is to register as many people as possible to vote. That is the goal, and we only have until Monday night.

That is the goal. One mission, bam. — Being here, first, I want to thank you as somebody with a spinal cord. Beat it because not many people are. I won’t take up the time, but 18,000 people a year are injured, so thank you. — Absolutely, and I’m hopeful that Neuralink can do a lot, actually, initially providing the ability for anyone who’s lost the brain-body connection to be able to interface with their phone and computer faster than a human with working hands, which is, I think, really cool. And then, but down the road,

I think it’ll be possible to restore a whole body functionality. If you have a Neuralink in the motor cortex that then shunts past where the neurons are damaged in the spine, I’m confident that long-term, you can actually restore people’s ability to walk and use their hands. — Well, I would love, I appreciate it. I would love to work with you on getting support around here, but — — Yeah, in fact, well, one of the things, and to be fair, the FDA has been, within the context of their current rules, has been actually quite supportive. They’ve given us Express Lane, ’cause they’ve seen the quality of the work and the sophistication of the technology.

They have given us a fast-track approval, but still, our progress is limited by regulatory issues, and that’s the same thing that’s happening with SpaceX. SpaceX can build a giant rocket faster than the license can be processed by the government, which is insane. I should mention, like, one of the most fundamental things about me supporting the biggest showstopper of all, for me, in terms of why I feel Donald Trump must win is that we have to have sensible regulations. We have so many regulatory, last time I checked, we have 428 regulatory, 428 agencies.

So there’s more than an agency a year has been created since America was a country. Like, we’ve got almost twice as many agencies as years that America’s been a country, which means an agency has been created, sometimes two new agencies per year created, which is just madness. So America is being smothered by overregulation. I call it slow strangulation by overregulation. That’s the, yeah. — I would like to ask about natural gas and lithium. That’s, you know what, Pennsylvania’s rich of natural resources and fracking gas and lithium,

which could benefit not only our state, but our entire country. However, many residents, and I have to be honest, along 350 miles of Pennsylvania, had real challenges like eminent domain and the destruction of water sources, such as what happened with the Mariners Pipeline. How can we ensure that while utilizing these resources, we work closely with local governments and residents without the federal government overreaching and forcing land from homeowners? Effective communication with citizens and their involvement in these decisions is crucial. What role do you see for technology or private industry in making sure that this process is transparent and fair? Because believe you me, lots of people were forced with eminent domain and aquifers poisoned all across Pennsylvania,

including our veterans. And this has been a real problem since 2016. So we wanna support our workers and use our gas. And I want it, but we need to be careful of what we’re taking from people who’ve lived here, families for centuries. — Certainly, I believe in sensible regulation, but what I see happening is that there are all sorts of, there’s a mountain of rules that actually don’t benefit people. And then there’s missing rules that do benefit people. So it’s this bizarre Kafka nightmare of regulations where ultimately the good of the people is not served.
 


And we get regulatory delays for things that are fake. Meanwhile, bad things are allowed to happen simply because someone filled out the paper book and gamed the system. So that’s what I mean. It’s when I say like Department of Governance is in addressing any issue which is not in the interest of the people. And we do need to, at times, fight against what large corporations are pushing for, ’cause some of them are very short term and some large corporations do bad things. And corporations are like people. Like some people are good peoples. Some corporations are good, some are meddling,

and sometimes some corporations are bad. And it’s just like people is the way to think of corporations. So we’ve gotta stop the corporations that wanna do bad things, make sure they’re doing things that are in the interest of the people. And then corporations that wanna do good things, they shouldn’t be slowed down by smothering regulation. — And we all need to be responsible. — Yeah, absolutely. And I think these things should be done very much in the interest of the people. — Thank you.

(audience applauding) — Hey, Elon, how are you? I’m Brad. These are two tough acts to follow here, but my question’s a little more simple. What are some of the first courses of action you plan to take as the head of government efficiency if Trump gets elected? And do you have any areas of concern in particular? — Yeah, well, that’s a good question. I definitely focus right now is making sure that Trump wins the election. Otherwise, it doesn’t matter. And I think if Trump loses, we’re gonna see our cities are gonna get less safe, the borders are obviously gonna be wide open,

we’re gonna see government spending go ballistic, it’s inflation going nuts, it’s gonna be just bad on every level. Fundamentally, the current trend of strangulation by overregulation is not turned around. We will never get to Mars. It just will be illegal. And then we’ll be a one-planet civilization. There won’t be a space-faring civilization, and stuff will never be real. And we want stuff to be real. — Yeah.

- Now, I’ve had quite a bit of interaction with the government, because SpaceX is the biggest NASA contractor, actually. There’s a lot of work for NASA. And I’m a big fan of the agency, by the way. But there are expenditures that don’t make a lot of sense, that are wasteful. And we need to put a stop to that. Honestly, there’s so much government waste that’s going on that I would call it a target-rich environment. It’s hard, in every direction, there’s just mad waste. And I think simply, if people simply know

that if they waste a ton of taxpayer money, they’re gonna get fired, that will immediately improve the situation. Immediately. Yeah, it’s just literally, and I think, but actually, it’s gonna be both carrot and stick. If a government official is very effective in spending your money, ’cause taxpayer money is your money, if they’re effective in spending your money, they should be promoted, they should be rewarded. And if they waste your money, or do something that’s basically corruption, they should be fired.

Obviously. They have a duty to spend your money well. Yeah. — Hey, Elon. As a veteran who was deployed because of a lie that was told 21 years ago. — A lot of lies, man. This is a lot of lies. — With harassment laws running on a campaign to make disinformation illegal, what would you say to — — Yeah, disinformation just means information they don’t like. — So what would you say — (audience applauding) What would you say to an administration and a candidacy that is spreading lies or disinformation about the troops that are currently in combat, my friends? — Yeah, can you believe that was said?

- Steve Adubato’s day, and 100 minus laptop presence decline and so on. — Yeah. During the Trump-Kamala debate, she said there was no active duty soldiers out there. I’m like, I know a whole bunch of them. What are you talking about? That’s a shameful, terrible lie. Shit, and she wasn’t even fact-checked. And I’m like, are you kidding? Yeah, thank you.

Yeah, and I just like to say, for the people, for the Americans out there who are serving in dangerous places right now, unlike what Kamala said, thank you for your service to the country. (audience applauding) — For stepping up to help America when you don’t have to. You could be on an island right now. — Yeah. I could be — — He doesn’t seem timid. — Yeah, he does not seem timid. — Yeah, I have a lot of jobs. No, it’s true. There are a lot of people I know who are on a yacht,

sipping a Mai Tai, whatever, on an island. There’s a thing I could be doing. I can’t if I think the future of the nation is at stake, which I do. (audience applauding) — You know Alberto Congauala? He’s the system manager for Europa Clipper. — Oh, that’s a cool mission, by the way. — Which you sent into space on Monday. — Yeah, yeah. — Thank you very much. — Absolutely, in fact, that was a mission where I talked to SpaceX. That mission’s important, but this mission’s excellent.

Yeah, ’cause I think like you, like I think most people, I want a future where you look forward to it and you’re excited about what’s gonna happen, that we’re gonna learn new things, that it’s gonna be better than the past, and a future where we’re a space-faring civilization, and we’re out there among the stars, where Star Trek is real. That’s exciting. Can’t just be about solving one problem after another. There have to be things that inspire. (audience applauding) That’s a hard one to build, but at some point we should build a warp drive.

But even without the warp drive, the Starship, the rocket made by SpaceX, is capable of building a city on Mars and a city on the Moon. That’s what it’s designed to do, but we’re being massively slowed down by regulatory molasses. And I’ll tell you a crazy thing. We got fined $140,000 by the EPA for dumping fresh water on the ground, drinking water. It’s crazy. I’ll just give you an example of just how crazy it is. And we’re like, we’re using water to cool the launch pad during launch.

We’re gonna cool the launch pad so it doesn’t overheat. And in an excess of caution, we actually brought in drinking water, so clean, super clean water. And the FAA says, “No, you have to pay a $140,000 fine.” And we’re like, but we let Starbase is in a tropical thunderstorm area. Sky water falls all the time. That is the same as the sky. So we didn’t actually, there’s no harm to anything. And they said, yeah, we didn’t have a pump for fresh water. Are you, what?

It’s just totally crazy stuff like that. They said, if we don’t pay the fine, they’re not gonna process any of our future applications. So they’re like, this is the kind of crazy stuff we’re dealing with, yeah. — Hi, Yilong. My name is Sarah. I’m from Philadelphia. I have a whole team here. First, I’m really excited about your real recapping of the rockets and your Hyperloop program.

We actually, at this critical moment, have a proposal to turn the blue to red quickly. I would like to sincerely like to accept our protocol in the proposal. And we want to have some further discussion with you. And really thank for putting everything you have, risking everything you have to support President Trump to take our country back. — Well, thank you. Sure, thanks. Hey, all right. — Yeah, we shake the hand.

Last week, I also fly to the Austin to find you. So glad you are here. I’m used to be having a busy day. — Great, all right, sounds good. All right, yeah. I’ll take a few more questions and then wrap it up. But yeah, so go ahead. — Elon, hi, my name’s Kevin and I grew up right here right in Springfield close by. And I want to thank you for all you’ve given up. You were the media darling and you’ve sacrificed everything for freedom right now.

I want to thank you for my family and everything. I also want to thank you. I want to thank you for all the lives that have been saved with your full self-driving and all the future lives will be saved with that. That is one of the bravest things you’ve put through. I use that every day. — You must have all given many lives and many serious injuries and also give people their time back so they can just be in their car and do whatever they want and watch movies or do great. — Absolutely great. My question for you is, and this is a very confusing thing in Pennsylvania. Do you think that we should, as a voter, vote in person, wait until voting day to vote in person

or do a mail-in ballot right now? — I think you should vote immediately right now, yes. — Can you explain real quick why? — Should you have a pen? I don’t know if somebody has a pen or something. Nice to meet you. All right, yeah, where were we? Oh yes, vote, yes. Register and vote early. And yeah, I would say vote immediately.

Yeah, you’re welcome. All right, I’ll take one more question and then we’ll call it a wrap. — Elon, this is Matt from EastWest IT Services here. I’m the chairman for the Pennsylvania Chinese Coalition. We have more than 40 Chinese groups and also different kinds of association. And I’m from Philadelphia. We are a team and I want to know, could you give us like a Pennsylvania swing state, especially Philadelphia, there’s a lot of Democrats. Could you give us three top reasons why people should vote for Donald Trump? — Sure, well, the reasons that resonate

are gonna be different depending on who you’re talking to. But I think the ones that resonate, for me at least, are we want safer cities, we want a secure border, we want sensible government spending, we want support of the constitution and the freedom of speech, right to bear arms. And that’s what Donald Trump is gonna do. (audience applauding) The other thing I think is maybe a little bit of a joke, the other thing I think is maybe a concern is that I think if there’s four more years of the puppet regime, they’re actually gonna legalize so many illegals in the swing states that there won’t be swing states anymore. And this will be the last election in that case.

And we’ll be a permanent one party state like California. Here in California, which is mind blowing, they passed a law banning voter ID for any election in California whatsoever. Now they’re gonna try to do that nationwide. In fact, if they can, they will do it nationwide. If the Dems win, they’ll ban voter ID nationwide. So that’s why I think if Trump doesn’t win, this is the last election. Yeah, thank you. 查看全部

点击下面视频链接，观看马斯克馬斯克最新訪談
 
https://pomf2.lain.la/f/ey8e7eqq.mp4
 
 
https://files.catbox.moe/b2e2vk.mp4
 
 
2024年10月馬斯克最新訪談：卡馬拉哈里斯只是一個傀儡 
 





 
 
0:00 there were no people voting. It was all just Dem Party elite that just appointed someone. 
       民主党选择美国总统大选候选人不进行民主投票。卡马拉仅仅靠民主党上层人士指派 
0:24 it's almost not even worth criticizing Kamala Harris. 
        批评卡马拉哈里斯毫无意思 
0:29 She's simply the face of a much larger machine. 
        指责卡马拉哈里斯毫无意义，她只是权利机器的一个傀儡 
0:36 she will say whatever is on the teleprompter, she's going to say it. 
      卡马拉哈里斯只会照本宣读演讲提示器上的内容，她不会脱稿演讲 
1:03 it's really whoever controls the teleprompter is the actual, that's who's actually in charge. 
       谁能掌控演讲提示器，谁就能掌控卡马拉哈里斯 
1:32 Kamala is sort of a marionette with a thousand puppet masters type of thing. 
      卡马拉这个提线木偶后，大约有一千个掌控人 
 
Full English Language Subtitle from Elon Musk: 
 
the people voted. No, there were no people voting. It was all just Dem Party elite that just appointed someone. And when the Biden puppet, when the pro-Biden puppet's ratings sagged, they knocked him in the back immediately and just tossed him out and put a new puppet on. That's exactly what happened. Tell me I'm wrong. Well not only are you right, I mean it's almost not even worth criticizing Kamala Harris. No, no, exactly. What does she have to do with it? Well there's no point in criticizing Kamala. She's simply the face of a much larger machine. And she will say whatever is on the teleprompter, she's going to say it. Now she gets stuck if the teleprompter breaks. That happened recently I think. The teleprompter stalled and she was just like looping for a while, for about a minute. I think that happened yesterday or something. It was pretty funny to watch. But she'll just say whatever words are on the teleprompter. So it's really whoever controls the teleprompter is the actual, that's who's actually in charge. And who is that, do you think? Well I've tried to put it down. It's not like any one kind of mastermind. It's not like, it seems to be, Kamala is sort of a marionette with a thousand puppet masters type of thing. Somewhere north of a hundred is what it seems like.I bet you know 80 of them. Probably know most of them, yeah. 查看全部

 
 
 
 





特斯拉發布會2024時間軸：

00:00 特斯拉2024釋出會直播正式開始 
02:27 伊隆馬斯克親自乘坐特斯拉無人駕駛計程車入場 
02:48 釋出會現場有50輛完全無人駕駛的特斯拉計程車 
03:12 特斯拉無人駕駛計程車沒有方向盤和踏板 
04:46 特斯拉的自動駕駛技術已經非常成熟 
05:59 汽車每週的平均使用時間是10小時左右 
06:27 馬斯克認為無人駕駛汽車的安全性將是人類的十倍 
06:51 馬斯克用無人電梯比喻無人汽車的發展 
07:25 馬斯克把特斯拉計程車當作自動駕駛世界中的一個小休息室 
08:22 馬斯克認為特斯拉無人駕駛計程車的價格大約為每英里30或40美分 
08:39 馬斯克預計特斯拉計程車的費用將低於30,000美元 
08:57 馬斯克預測未來的計程車司機會像牧羊人一樣，管理20輛無人駕駛計程車 
09:10 特斯拉將在2025年，在德克薩斯州和加利福尼亞州啟動完全自動、無監督的FSD無人駕駛 
10:15 馬斯克說在2027年之前量產特斯拉無人駕駛計程車 
10:34 馬斯克承諾會在美國任何監管機構基本上批准的地方，上線自動駕駛的特斯拉 
11:44 無人駕駛比人工駕駛安全性提高10倍的真正原因 
12:12 特斯拉的無人駕駛依靠的是人工智慧和視覺演算法，不需要昂貴的硬體 
12:30 特斯拉Model 3、Model Y、S和X已經具備無人自動駕駛的能力 
14:20 馬斯克演示特斯拉感應充電功能 
14:39 特斯拉電動車只需駛過感應充電器便可充電。 
16:16 特斯拉釋出無人駕駛客運大巴 16:49 特斯拉Robovin就是一個無人駕駛的公交車 
18:03 馬斯克公佈Optimus機器人 20:10 Optimus機器人的售價預計為20,000到30,000美元 
19:09 Optimus機器人可以用來做老師、照顧你的小孩、遛狗、修剪草坪、買雜貨、當服務員倒飲料 
21:21 搜尋美國公牛網，討論最新特斯拉無人駕駛計程車話題



FULL ENGLISH SPEECH:

So we have quite a show for you tonight. I think you're going to like it. As you can see, I just arrived in the robo-taxi, the cyber cab. And there's 20 more where that came from. So they've been traveling. They're all-- there's no people in them, as you can see. The cars are just going by with no people. [CHEERING] And we have 50 fully autonomous cars here tonight. [CHEERING] So you'll see Model Ys and the cyber cab, all driverless. You'll be able to take a ride in the cyber cab.

There's no steering wheel or pedals. [CHEERING] So I hope this goes well. You see a lot of sci-fi movies where the future is dark and dismal, where it's not a future you want to be in. So, you know, like, I love Blade Runner, but I don't know if we want that future. I think we want that duster he's wearing, but not the bleak apocalypse. We want to have a fun, exciting future that, if you could look in a crystal ball and see the future, you'd be like, "Yes, I wish I could be there now." That's what we want. So when we think about transport today, there's a lot of kind of pain

that we take for granted that we think is normal, like having to drive around L.A. in, like, three hours of traffic. Yeah, and people that live in L.A., I mean, you know, try to get from Pasadena to, you know, El Segundo during rush hour. You can fly to, you know, another city faster than you can get to Crosstown, L.A. So, and you have to drive the whole way, unless you're on a Tesla, of course. Now, Tesla already does quite well at this, you know, supervised self-driving. So supervised full self-driving is actually working quite well. I'm sure there's people in the crowd, you're using that, yeah? [Cheers] So we'll move from supervised full self-driving to unsupervised full self-driving, where the car, you could fall asleep and wake up at your destination. So, but there's also a challenge for a lot of people that cars cost too much.

I mean, when you factor in everything that goes into a car and the car insurance and the car payments and the storage of the car, it's very expensive. So with, and you say like how often are, how many hours a week are cars used? Your average passenger car is only used about 10 hours a week out of 168 hours. So the vast majority of the time, cars are just doing nothing. But if they're autonomous, they could be used, I don't know, five times more? Maybe 10 times more. So you could actually, for the same car, would have five times as much value, maybe 10 times as much value. It's, there's 168 hours in the week, and like I said, only 10 of them are used for

driving. So and then a bunch of those hours are looking for a parking spot, which is, you know, can be pretty annoying at times. So we want, with autonomy, you get your time back. This is a very big deal. So it's not just a safe, like it'll save lives, like a lot of lives, and prevent injuries. I think we'll see autonomous cars become 10 times safer than a human. I mean, if you think of times past where there were, there used to be an elevator operator in every elevator, but once in a while, they get, you know, they get tired, and accidentally shear somebody in half, you know.

So now we have automated elevators. You just get in an elevator, and you press a button, and you don't even think about it. And it just takes you to the floor. And if you did see an elevator operator with a big relay switch, you'd be like, that's weird. Now that's how cars will be. And it's not just the lives saved in injuries, but if you look at, think about the cumulative time that people spend in a car, and the time that they will get back, that they can now spend, well, I guess on their phones, or watching a movie, or doing work, or whatever you want to do.

You can think of the car in an autonomous world as being like just a little lounge. You're just sitting in a comfortable little lounge, and you can do whatever you want while you're in this comfortable little lounge. And when you get out, you will be at your destination. So yeah, this can be awesome. So, in fact, I think the cost of autonomous transport will be so low that you can think of it like individualized mass transit. The average cost of a bus per mile for a city, not the ticket price, because that is subsidized, but the average price is about a dollar a mile. Whereas the cost of cyber cab, we think probably over time,

the operating cost is probably going to be around 20 cents a mile. And price, including taxes and everything else, probably ends up being 30 or 40 cents a mile. So yes, and you will be able to buy one. Yes, exactly. And we expect the cost to be below $30,000. And I think there will be an interesting business model where, like, let's say somebody is an Uber or Lyft driver today, where they can actually sort of manage a fleet of cars, and like sort of manage, I don't know,

10, 20 cars, and just sort of, you know, take care of them like a shepherd tends their flock. You have a little, you know, flock of cars, and you're the shepherd, and you take care of your flock of cars. I think that would be pretty cool. And I think it's going to be a glorious future. It's going to be really something special. So -- >> It won't be available. >> Yes. Good -- all excellent questions. So we do expect actually to start fully autonomous, unsupervised FSD in Texas and

California next year. And that's obviously -- that's with the Model 3 and Model Y. And then we expect to be in production with the Cyber Cab, which is really highly optimized for autonomous transport in probably -- well, I tend to be a little optimistic with timeframes. But in 2026. So, yeah. Before 2027. Let me put it that way. And we'll make this vehicle in very high volume. And -- but well before that, you will experience a robotic taxi via the Model 3 and Model Y program. And Model S and X too. But the Model -- your 3 and Y will be -- will achieve unsupervised full stop driving with permission in wherever regulators essentially approve it in the U.S. and then to follow in outside the U.S.

So -- and the Cybertruck too. Yes, of course. Sorry. I don't want to be -- yes, yes. All our cars are basically -- all cars that we make. So -- let's not get nuanced here. All right. Next slide. So, one of the reasons why the computer can be so much better than a person is that we have millions of cars that are training on driving. So it's like living millions of lives simultaneously and seeing very unusual situations that a person in their entire lifetime would not see.

But hopefully. Yes. Exactly. So -- so with that amount of training data, it's obviously going to be much better than what a human could be because you can't live a million lives. And it's also -- it can see in all directions simultaneously. And it doesn't get tired or text or any of those things. So it will naturally be, like I said, 10, 20, 30 times safer than a human. Just for all those reasons. And I want to emphasize that the solution that we have is AI and vision. So there's no expensive equipment needed.

So the Model 3, Model Y, and S and X that we make today will be capable of full autonomy unsupervised. And that means that our cost of producing the vehicle is low. Now, we are going to actually overspec the computer for the CyberCab. So our AI5 computer will be somewhat overspec. And because I think there's actually also an opportunity sort of like an Amazon Web Services where if the car is driving for 50 hours a week, there's still over 100 hours left. And there's a potential there to have a massive amount of distributed inference compute where if you've got, like, say, a fleet of 100 million vehicles and a kilowatt of efficient inference compute, you have 100 gigawatts of compute, which is really quite substantial. And if it's there, you might as well use it. So, yeah.

So that's -- that I think will make sense. So all right. So our autonomous future is here. As I said, we've got 50 Teslas driving autonomously. We're trying to give you a sense of what cities will be like in the future. And when you get in, you'll see, like, it's really quite a wild experience to just be in a car with no steering wheel, no pedals, no controls. And it feels great. So -- and we have enough vehicles here, so everyone should be able to try it out and experience the set that we've built here.

It's a very big set. So it's, like, really -- we've used sort of, I don't know, 20, 30 acres or something like that. It's really big. So it goes on -- the ride's long. And we set it up to feel like a ride, like a park ride. So it'll be cool. And you'll get to experience it tonight. [ Cheers and applause ] Something we're also doing is -- and it's really high time we did this -- is inductive charging. So the Robotaxi has no plug.

It just goes over the inductive charger and charges. So yeah. That's kind of how it should be. Thanks, guys. I love you, too. So one of the things that, like, is really interesting is how will this affect the cities that we live in? And when you drive around a city or when a car drives you around a city, you'll see there's a lot of parking lots. There's parking lots everywhere.

Parking garages. And so what would happen if you have an autonomous world is that you can now turn parking lots into parks. And so from -- we're taking the "ing" lot out of "parking lot." Welcome. So there's a lot of opportunity to create green space in the cities that we live in. So I think that would be quite fantastic. Oh, and also, what happens if you need a vehicle that is bigger than a Model Y? The Robovin. The Robovin is -- this is -- we're going to make this. And it's going to look like that. Now, can you imagine going down the streets and you see this coming towards you?

That would be sick. So this can carry up to 20 people, and it can also transport goods. So you can configure it for goods transport within a city or transport up to 20 people at a time. So this is going to -- the Robovin is what's going to solve for high density. So if you want to take a sports team somewhere or you're looking to really get the cost of travel down to, I don't know, 5, 10 cents a mile, then you can use the Robovin. Some people call it the Robovin. So yeah. You know, one of the things we want to do -- and you've seen this with the Cybertruck -- is we want to change the look of the roads. The future should look like the future.

So speaking of robots, so everything we've developed for our cars, the batteries, power electronics, the advanced motors, gear boxes, the software, the AI inference computer, it all actually applies to a humanoid robot. It's the same techniques. It's just a robot with arms and legs instead of a robot with wheels. And we've made a lot of progress with the Optimus. And as you can see, we started out with someone in a robot suit, sort of dad, and then we've progressed dramatically year after year. So if you extrapolate this, you're really going to have something spectacular, something that anyone could own.

So you could have your own personal R2D2 C3PO. And I think at scale, this would cost something like, I don't know, $20,000, $30,000. Less than a car is my prediction long-term. Take us a minute to get to the long-term. But fundamentally at scale, the Optimus robot, you should be able to buy an Optimus robot for I think probably $20,000 to $30,000 long-term. And what can it do? It'll be able to do anything you want. So it can be a teacher, babysit your kids, it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries, just be your friend, serve drinks.

Whatever you can think of, it will do. And yeah, it's going to be awesome. I think this will be the biggest product ever of any kind. Because I think everyone of the 8 billion people of Earth, I think everyone's going to want their Optimus buddy. And there's going to be maybe two. And then there'll be producing products and services. I predict actually provided we address risks of digital superintelligence, 80% probability of good outcome. Look on the bright side.

The cup is 80% full. The cost of products and services will decline dramatically. And basically anyone will be able to have any products and services they want. It will be an age of abundance. The likes of which people have not -- almost no one has envisioned. It will be something special. So one of the things we wanted to show tonight was that Optimus is not a canned video. It's not walled off. The Optimus robots will walk among you. Please be nice to the Optimus robots.

So you'll be able to walk right up to them. And they'll serve drinks at the bar. And you'll directly -- I mean, it's a wild experience just to have humanoid robots. And they're there. Just in front of you. So yeah. With that, let's party! [Cheers and applause] I love you guys, too. If you look at that gazebo over there, let's get the party started.
  查看全部

 
 
 


 
 
该视频时间轴：

00:00 马斯克认为如果特朗普在这次2024年总统选举中没有胜出，那么将会是美国最后一次民主选举

00:32 马斯克抨击民主党正在将大量非法移民运送到摇摆州

00:55 所有摇摆州的非法移民人数都有三位数的增长

01:48 非法移民的首要任务是让他们的朋友和家人也来到美国

02:00 马斯克的预测是，如果再有四年的民主党政府，到下一次选举，就不会有摇摆州了

02:17 美国将是一个单一政党执政的国家，就像加州是一个单一政党执政的州一样
 
 
该视频英文字幕： 
 
I mean, my view is that if Trump doesn’t win this election, it’s the last election we’re going to have. That the Democrats, the Dem machine, has been importing so many people, bringing in so many illegals, flying in with this like CBP border app thing that nobody even knew about, like secret program. That’s illegal basically. They’re transporting large numbers of illegals to swing states. If you look at the numbers, these are the numbers from the government website. So like from the Democrat administered government website. From the government website that is run by Democrats. And there are triple digit increases in illegals to all the swing states. Now these swing state margins are sometimes,So what happens if you put hundreds of thousands of people into each swing state? When somebody is granted asylum, they are fast tracked. They can get a green card, and then five years after the green card, they can get citizenship and they can fully legally vote. And when they do so, they vote overwhelmingly Democrat. And sometimes I get this rebuttal of like, well, a lot of them, their social values don’t align with sort of the far left sort of woke ideology. I said, that’s true, but that’s not their top priority. Their top priority is getting their friends and family also to the United States. And the Dems also issue all these programs, these sort of handouts essentially, that make them beholden to the Democratic Party. So they vote Dem. That’s what happens. So my prediction is if there’s another four years of a Dem administration, they will legalize, so many illegals that are there, that the next election, there won’t be any swing states. And we’ll be a single party country, just like California is a single party state. That’s a super majority Dem state in California. Because of immigration. Yes. California was fairly reliably Republican. Bill Clinton lost California in ’92 and won West Virginia. Yes. So there was a 1986 amnesty. And thereafter, California trended very strongly Dem. And is at this point, I think, 65, 70% Dem, something like that. It’s super majority Dem. The California legislature is more than two-thirds Democrat.
 
 

 
该视频标签：
 


2024年10月伊隆馬斯克人生觀｜伊隆馬斯克名言英文｜伊隆馬斯克故事｜特斯拉｜特斯拉台灣｜馬斯克最新 查看全部

请查看视频下方的时间轴，可以快速帮助你找到你喜欢的话题
 
 
 

 
00:00 2024美国总统大选副总统辩论开始
00:14 可能是本次总统选举周期的最后一场辩论
01:35 双方竞选团队达成一致的辩论规则
04:03 沃尔兹支持援助以色列，获得军事优势
04:38 特朗普任期内的两位国防部长和国家安全顾问都说他不应该再次竞选美国总统
05:57 副总统候选人万斯的职业生涯和自我介绍
06:55 万斯指责哈里斯政府让伊朗获得超过1000亿美元的解冻资产
08:14 沃尔兹讽刺特朗普的外交政策就是在推特上发推文
10:10 万斯吹捧特朗普四年总统期，让世界没有发生大规模战争
13:39 特朗普称气候变化是假新闻
14:08 北美最大的太阳能制造厂位于明尼苏达州
15:44 万斯说花费数亿甚至数十亿美元的美国纳税人的钱去购买在中国制造的太阳能电池板，将使经济变得更脏。
17:49 万斯曾说将动用美国军队去驱逐非法移民
18:53 万斯支持特朗普的边境政策，修建围墙，重新驱逐非法移民
18:59 万斯说美国境内有2000万到2500万的非法移民
19:12 万斯说应该先驱逐那些犯罪的非法移民
19:33 美国国土安全部证实实际上已经有32万名儿童失踪
21:07 特朗普反对通过最公正和最严格的移民法案
21:48 沃尔兹说解决非法移民问题的根本在于美国国会，而不能仅仅通过行政命令
23:22万斯指责哈里斯是边境沙皇，她撤销了94个特朗普的行政命令
23:47 根据民调，超过50%的美国人支持大规模驱逐偷渡非法移民
26:03 万斯指责哈里斯带来了数百万非法移民与美国人争夺稀缺的住房
27:08 沃尔兹拿圣经来比喻非法移民：“你们如何对待弱小人群，就会如何对待上帝"
30:15 沃尔兹所在的明尼苏达州，法律为小企业提供5000美元的税收抵免，将其增加到50000美元
30:37 沃尔兹攻击特朗普会对所有美国人的收入征收20%的消费税或销售税
31:49 万斯攻击哈里斯的政策让食品价格上涨了25%，住房成本上涨了约60%
34:15 特朗普在过去15年里没有支付任何联邦税
41:05 万斯曾说特朗普是美国版的希特勒
43:31 万斯说中国雇佣奴隶劳工的每天工资是3美元
45:35 明尼苏达州支持女性自主抉择是否生育权利
45:44 沃尔兹坦言是医疗治愈了他的不孕症
46:02 由于德州禁止女性堕胎，导致德克萨斯州的孕产妇死亡率飙升
46:12 数据表明，沃尔兹治理的明尼苏达州，医疗保健排名全美第一
48:03 万斯说应该让各个州制定他们的堕胎政策
48:11 万斯说美国是一个非常混乱、且分裂的国家
51:09 明尼苏达州是青少年怀孕率最低的州之一
53:14 沃尔兹说女性可以自己选择生或者不生孩子，他人没有决定权
54:37 主持人说美国儿童和青少年死亡的主要原因是枪支暴力
56:23 万斯说哈里斯打开南部边境，导致美国非法枪支数量大幅增加
56:45 万斯认为可以给学校安装更牢固的门和窗户，来防止校园枪支暴力
01:00:24 沃尔兹口误声称和校园枪击罪犯成为朋友
01:00:36 沃尔兹表明自己车里备有散弹枪
01:02:21 沃尔兹表明他的一生只买过并拥有一套房子
01:03:22 Minneapolis是全美最低通货膨胀率的城市之一
01:04:44 万斯说非法移民推高了美国住房成本
01:04:46 两千五百万的非法移民与美国人争抢稀缺住房，是推动全国房价上涨的重要因素之一
01:07:36 沃尔兹说在联邦土地上新建住房只会成为有钱人赚钱的机会
01:15:40 《平价医疗法案》下的注册人数在特朗普政府期间和拜登任期都确有增加
01:17:00 美国是世界上为数不多的没有父母带薪休产假福利的发达国家之一
01:21:40 美联储表示，美国父母每月在儿童护理上的支出几乎与住房支出相当
01:27:32 万斯表示卡马拉·哈里斯在进行大规模的舆论审查，这是40年来，美国最大的民主威胁
01:29:32 特朗普曾试图推翻公正的总统选举和权力的和平交接
01:36:16 沃尔兹表示特朗普竞选总统会让很多美国人感到害怕
01:37:34 万斯表示哈里斯的政策让很多美国人买不起一顿好的饭菜
 





 
 
  查看全部

 
 


 00:00 开始 
00:09 哪些美国福利会影响到我的绿卡申请？使用白卡到底会不会影响到我的移民申请？ 
00:23 “使用白卡福利会影响绿卡申请”这个谣言产生的历史原因 
01:00 有5类人是不受公共负担政策的影响 
01:36 有3种美国社会福利可能会被默认为是公共负担。 
02:04 没有身份的外国人，如果领取了政府现金的公共福利，有可能会影响到移民。 
02:16 有哪些福利不会影响绿卡申请， 
02:31 使用白卡不太可能影响到你的移民 
02:39 long term住院和nursing home会影响到绿卡申请 
02:51 区别的标准就是，只要不是领取现金，基本不会被移民局认为是公共负担，也不会影响申请绿卡。 
02:53 订阅我们的youtube频道，了解最新美国移民和美国绿卡信息
 
 
首先呢，我们要清楚这个传言是怎么来的。确实在2016年至2021年期间，由于I944表格的存在，前美国总统川普当局对于所有领取福利的外国人，在申请绿卡时都严格审核。该政策和I944表格让人谈虎色变，导致很多本来完全符合资格领公共福利的人都不敢去领了，哦。这无疑也是违背该政策的初衷。当然，I944表格最后也被取消了。 但是依旧会有人问：我真的需要帮助时，要不要领福利？什么样的情况下会影响到我的绿卡申请？ 那首先呢，
 
有5类人是不受公共负担政策的影响，具体包括下面这五类： 
第一类：难民身份； 
第二类：特殊青少年移民，英文是：Special Immigrant Juvenile; 
第三类：TPS临时保护状态的人，即委内瑞拉、缅甸、索马里身份的人; 
第四类：U签证和T签证的持有者; 
第五类：VAWA的受害者,如被家暴的受害者和孩子； 
那么，综上所述呢， 就是：所有的弱势群体是不受领取福利影响的；但如果你是外国人，最后要申请美国绿卡的话，
 
那以下3种福利可能会被默认为是公共负担： 
第一种呢：辅助社案津贴，英文全称是：Supplement Security Income, 即SSI项目; 
第二种呢：贫困家庭现金援助，英文全称名是：Temporary Assistance for Needy Family, 也就是TANF项目; 
然后，那第三种呢：就是州政府和当地的现金援助计划，又称为General Assistance program; 
 
其实判断的标准就是，外国人没有身份，但是领取了政府现金的公共福利，有可能会影响到移民；相反，非现金的福利就不会被默认为是公共负担，不会影响到你的绿卡申请，
 
不会影响绿卡申请的福利包括： 
第一种：营养援助计划; 
然后第二种：针对妇女新生婴儿的物品领取计划;
然后第三种：学校早中饭项目;
第四种：白卡； 
 
白卡，这是很多人最关心的，其实使用白卡不太可能影响到你的移民。只有一种例外，就是使用白卡进行长期也就是long term住院，比如住在护理家庭，也就是Nursing Home。或者是这种精神疾病机构。 除此以外，还有许多其他的项目并不会被默认为是公共负担。区别的标准就是，只要不是领取现金，基本不会被移民局认为是公共负担，也不会影响申请绿卡。
 





  查看全部

 
 

 00:00 开始 
00:09 让美国国会议员帮助催案件进展，可以吗? 这个信息是真的吗？ 
00:18 一般国会议员办公室只处理超过正常处理时间的案件才会帮写信 
00:26 要先登陆美国移民局网站上面，查找关于你案件类别的正常处理时间 
00:54 为什么说找美国议员写信的效果意义不大 
01:07 美国移民局电话8003752283，和美国移民法庭查询热线：8008987180 
01:22 想加快案件办理速度，最直接有效的办法就是办理催判令 
01:24 什么是催办令，催办令的本质是什么 
01:45 案件通过率跟国会议员写信没有关系，主要看你个人的硬性证据是否充足 
01:50 订阅我们的youtube频道，了解更多美国移民信息
 





  查看全部

 

 
 00:00 开始 
00:20 在中美都有收入的情况下，我的收入是否需要全球征税？ 
00:35 绿卡持有者是美国的永久居民，在全球的任何一个地方所拿到的收入，都应该向美国的国税局申报税务。 
00:43 每年都需要向美国国税局申报赚了多少钱 
01:16 美国税务律师主要是做税务的官司, 而财产、收入的申报以及税务的申报要找美国会计师去做 
01:36 如果说资产是你在拿绿卡之前已经获得的，这个资产本身是不需要交税的。 
01:40 资产只是申报，但不需要交税。 
02:00 美国绿卡和工卡持有者不需要重复交税 
02:13 在免税额以内，如果你已经在其他国家已经交完税，你只要如实的申报就可以了 
02:30 可以用中国和美国两地不同的税务制度去合法避税 
02:35 处理美国税务问题，一定要找专业的会计师和税务师 
02:36 订阅我们的美国移民频道， 了解更多美国交税信息 
 
 
 
首先需要明确的是美国是一个全球征税的国家，绿卡持有者是美国的永久居民，那你在全球的任何一个地方所拿到收入，都应该向美国的国税局申报税务。而且美国的税务的交税体系跟其他国家不太一样，美国是自主申报体系。那你要先自己申报说我今年赚了多少钱，那么在这种情况下呢，大家应该找一个专业的靠谱的美国的会计师和美国的税务师，特别是精通中国大陆资产申报，在中国和美国甚至全球多个地方、都有收入纳税、报税的这种税务师。因为美国分工比较明确，税务的事情需要找专业的人士。税务律师主要是做税务的官司，比如说跟国税局打官司。要退税啊或者去申诉罚款啊、应对税务的调查啊。但是，财产、收入的申报以及税务的申报要找会计师去做。 那，一般情况下呢，大家不要太担心。因为，美国虽然是全球征税的国家，但是它还是例行一种实际申报实际纳税的一个原则。如果说资产是你在拿绿卡之前已经获得的，嗯，比如说你在上海有一套一千万的房子，这个资产本身是不需要交税的。很多人可能误解我资产原来积累了好多，我资产是不是要交税？不需要的，资产只是申报，但不需要交税。但是你就上海一千万的房子如果在拿绿卡之后卖了一千五百万，你这五百万需要交税的。 现在解答一下第二个问题：我需要重复缴税吗？ 据我所知不需要重复交税的，而且每一个外国的公民虽然说是美国的绿卡，但是他有免税额的。这样的情况下，在免税额以内，如果你已经在其他国家已经完税以内，你只要如实的申报就可以了。而且中国大陆人都很聪明啦，在这种资产的管理上面，有很多的方式可以去合理地规避税。你可以用中国和美国两地不同的税务制度去避税。在这种情况下，我认为绿卡申请者包括绿卡持有者不必太担心税务的问题，找到一个专业的会计师和税务师好好地帮你规划一下，一定没问题的。
 
 





  查看全部